| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Keinanen wrote:
... Even with a proper S&H (ten nanosecond sampling and several microsecond hold times) for decimation, the 280 Ksamples/s sounds a bit low for FM broadcast detection. The higher order (Bessel function) sidebands are still quite strong with the modulation indexes used, so truncating the bandwidth to the 100-140 kHz range might not be a good idea. ... The IF passband of an FM receiver needs to be at least 200 KHz for good quality and -- counterintuitive to me -- I'm told that the capture ratio improves as the bandwidth increases. Back in the 50s, one premium receiver -- the first I knew of to use semiconductor diodes in the detector -- had a half-MHz IF. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NEW Software Defined Radio Receiver! | Shortwave | |||
| Software defined radio | Homebrew | |||
| software defined radios | Shortwave | |||
| software defined radios | Shortwave | |||
| Software Defined Radios anyone? | Homebrew | |||