Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if we who are the Usenet-frequenting Radio Hams might somehow get
together to sort out the dreadful mess that has been created in no small part by the self-interest of those who control the RSCB? Might we all act together to produce a series of soggy "biscuits" that could then be assembled Lego-like fashion to produce any rig or test equipment? This would have a number of benefits, not the least of which would be the bankrupting of the cancerous emporia whose off-the-shelf Cheque-Book (CB) radios are not only discouraging the homebrew engineering that is the essence of _REAL_ Ham Radio but also encouraging an altogether undesirable element to regard themselves as of our ranks. Once the advertising income from those dead emporia ceased to flow, then the national societies might get back to supporting technical excellence instead of Complete Bull**** (CB) as they do now? (And, no, I'm not thinking in terms of the facile hardware exercises that bring on the disease known as the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme; facile because once a so-called "licence" has been granted the hardware diversion is largely forgotten.) Anybody interested in mutual development of some soggy biscuits is invited to reply to the author via these fora. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A anal gusher vent?
|
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jul, 15:35, "Polymath" wrote:
Anybody interested in mutual development of some soggy biscuits You are so in the wrong newsgroup :-) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Gathergood, G4KFK wrote:
On 7 Jul, 15:35, "Polymath" wrote: Anybody interested in mutual development of some soggy biscuits You are so in the wrong newsgroup :-) Right! We here use our grain to brew beer. Oh, wait... -- Postulate a group whose intent is to destroy the United States from within via anarchy and bankruptcy. The actions of the United States Congress are completely consistent with the actions one would predict from such a group. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 12:35 am, "Polymath" wrote:
Might we all act together to produce a series of soggy "biscuits" that could then be assembled Lego-like fashion to produce any rig or test equipment? Anybody interested in mutual development of some soggy biscuits is invited to reply to the author via these fora. -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com OK......what planet have you been on for the last 40 years? - check out a thing called the "integrated circuit" or "IC" for short. These are wonderful devices, they come as little plastic blocks with pins sticking out of them. You connect signal in/out, voltage, a few extra components to set parameters, and there you have a functioning electronic circuit.... Please, stop ranting about the decline of AR and start reading a few contemporary textbooks, or browsing manufacturers sites (they actually WANT you to use the things, so publish lots of free information and "application notes"...) or search the internet... Stop complaining so much about the demise of the "good old days" and start moving into 2007........ Andrew VK3BFA. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beanie is from the planet Anus.
"Andrew VK3BFA" wrote in message ups.com... OK......what planet have you been on for the last 40 years? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Testibus Torpidis wrote:
Beanie is from the planet Anus. "Andrew VK3BFA" wrote in message ups.com... OK......what planet have you been on for the last 40 years? Or would that be "URanus"? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:
On Jul 8, 12:35 am, "Polymath" wrote: Might we all act together to produce a series of soggy "biscuits" that could then be assembled Lego-like fashion to produce any rig or test equipment? OK......what planet have you been on for the last 40 years? - check out a thing called the "integrated circuit" or "IC" for short. I'd been thinking for some time about doing a little experimenting that involved putting together a few functional blocks which were a little more involved than ICs, things like IF gain blocks and detectors and the like. Much faster to A/B test circuits that way. -- Postulate a group whose intent is to destroy the United States from within via anarchy and bankruptcy. The actions of the United States Congress are completely consistent with the actions one would predict from such a group. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 9, 6:01 am, clifto wrote:
Andrew VK3BFA wrote: On Jul 8, 12:35 am, "Polymath" wrote: I'd been thinking for some time about doing a little experimenting that involved putting together a few functional blocks which were a little more involved than ICs, things like IF gain blocks and detectors and the like. Much faster to A/B test circuits that way. Yes. This is (usually) IC's on a PCB with the extra bits needed to get it to work. As long as you have the same impedance for each module, no worries. And the approach has merit - lacking sophisticated measuring equipment, its good to have a "reference" IF, RF, whatever module for A-B comparisons. I think EMRFD covers this concept quite well.... There has NEVER been a better time to homebrew. We are not relying on war surplus from a global conflict anymore, and its pretty well dried up anyway. So many fascinating chipsets out there, a casual reading of any of the last 10 years of ARRL handbooks reveals this "systems engineering" approach - treat them like LEGGO blocks.... There is SO MUCH sophisticated good quality test equipment out there now - most industries are downsizing (gee, I love that phrase) - its cheaper to send a defective module off for repair (the spare automatically switches in on a fault condition) to the manufacturer than maintain highly skilled staff and expensive test gear. So, the test gear is being sold at RIDICULOUS prices. I recently bought a Chinese 500Mhz spectrum analyser for $500 - yeh, sure, not as good as a HP, (refuse to call them AGILENT) but then my 30 year old HP141 etc was badly showing its age and was out of calibration anyway..... A good example - the AD9851 DDS chip . Wade through the pages of waffle, and it comes down to half the pins grounded, some more tied high, data in from a PC port on 3 lines, bias set by 1 resistor, a TTL clock module (prebuilt anyway) and a simple LPF on the ouput - voila, a 0-30Mhz sig gen/sweep gen/VFO with 1Hz increments, and crystal stability and accuracy. Doesn't need a complex PCB, can easily be paddyboarded/Manhattan style.... Go for it - don't be scared. The "good old days" were only in your head anyway, and it took the death of millions to provide us with that lovely war surplus precision mechanical engineering....what a terrible price to pay for a nice VFO capacitor and drive.... Times change - the Foundation license has transformed AR - yes, some idiots, but not nearly as many as the old timers noisily bemoaning their lost (and rose coloured) past.......all the dinosaurs will eventually die, do you want to be one? And getting an amateur ticket 30 years ago - how relevant is that now? - good to wallow in antique technology, but how about moving forward. My club - its been bloody fantastic. The new F calls, on the committee, bring new skills and enthusiasm. They can organise a dinner out - the old timers cannot. They organise technical lectures - the old timers, with their "I did that 40 years ago" attitude don't. A long overdue breath of fresh air - should have happened 30 years ago, and would have except for the moaning and bitching of the "true" amateurs. So saying that, I have been licensed for 36 years. I started homebrewing with valves I scavenged off the rubbish tip, as a kid of 12 I didn't have any money. First soldering iron was second hand, bought from the local radio club - in retrospect, sold at a fraction of its value to help a newcomer. Was mentored by WONDERFUL, true amateurs - generous with their time and knowledge. Are you? Carefully selecting the least leaky capacitors, measuring and marking old out of tolerance resistors to build something,anything, to explore radio. Even scavenging hookup wire from old washing machines and refrigerators on the tip. Nowadays, still have a good collection of WW2 vintage gear for restoration - most of it semi vandalized by idiots doing "modifications" - I like it, nice BIG components, easy to see and work on. The classic 70's radios with tube back ends - easy to work on, parts more readily available than modern consumer stuff on the shelves currently. But I also battle with SMD stuff - why, because that too is interesting - 1 chip does the work of a rackfull of valve gear. Its STILL the "magic of radio" - and I think a lot of us have got old and tired and grumpy and forgotten WHY we got into AR in the first place, Go for it - NOTHING beats the thrill of learning, exploring,experimenting, and finally getting on the air and saying "The rig here is homebrew OM"... 73 de Andrew VK3BFA. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Polymath" wrote in message ... I wonder if we who are the Usenet-frequenting Radio Hams might somehow get together to sort out the dreadful mess that has been created in no small part by the self-interest of those who control the RSCB? I think if you do some serious searching you find there are literally HUNDREDS of simple kits available for any ham who wants to build his own equipment. From sophisticated transcievers to tiny TunaTins, PSK-31 transmitters, and a few simple software defined rigs thrown in for good measure. I don't see the need for what you're proposing, and the market would have filled the gap if anyone else did. Pete |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting the Ham back into Ham Radio? | Homebrew | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Policy | |||
Putting up an Imax | CB | |||
Putting ARRL back "mainstream" with hometown hams | Policy |