Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey folks,
A lurking SWL listener here. Was wondering something about receivers in general. Why is it that all-band receivers are generally more expensive than HF-only receivers? I know there are other circuits in there, but in essence, aren't all receiver circuits basically the same, just with the ability to tune to different frequencies? I suppose another way of asking is this: a simple AM radio tank circuit could be modified by adjusting the coil turns and/or variable capacitor in order to pick up other frequencies. Why does this (rather oversimplified) simple change cause the cost of the receiver to go up nearly 50% in cost? (comparing a simple handheld AM radio with one that includes a shortwave band or two). An AM/FM stereo radio is cheaper in many cases than a similar radio with SW bands. But you'd think that VHF reception would be slightly more expensive to manufacture than AM's nearby neighbor SW. Confuses me. I also notice that HF transceivers can cost roughly the same as HF receivers - you'd think a receiver WITH transmitter would be much more expensive, but from what I can see its not. Something isn't registering in my mind as to why all these cost differences. Thanks for your responses. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Online postage costs worldwide? | General | |||
PCB costs | Antenna | |||
asshole chuckie bitching about shipping costs........... | CB |