Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:43:06 +0100, "Frank Dinger"
wrote: Talking about nails ,some time ago in the dutch amateur radio mag. 'Electron' , there was an article describing a kid's radio. ,dubbed 'Nail Radio' . Its construction was on a piece of timber into which copperclad nails had been hammered in circuit diagramme configuration . The components (for this medium wave receiver) were subsequently soldered to the nail heads. A superb way to introduce newcomers to electronics and radio home-brewing. A real circuit "board". Any technique that works, is good technique. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dinger wrote:
Nowadays I prefer using PC board for mounting components. The Al chassis being upside-down used as a shielded base. In many cases the smaller components can be just soldered together in "basket weave" construction supported by the ones that need to be soldered to the PC-board ground plane. Decades ago Pete Sulzer did his prototypes in full basket-weave style without a ground plane - but few people can visualize ground loops well enough to build RF circuits that way. When you visited his company you'd see his prototypes hanging from nails on the wall. =============== Talking about nails ,some time ago in the dutch amateur radio mag. 'Electron' , there was an article describing a kid's radio. ,dubbed 'Nail Radio' . Its construction was on a piece of timber into which copperclad nails had been hammered in circuit diagramme configuration . The components (for this medium wave receiver) were subsequently soldered to the nail heads. A superb way to introduce newcomers to electronics and radio home-brewing. Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH hehehe...as a kid I built a crystal radio like that. No soldering though. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:43:06 +0100, "Frank Dinger"
wrote: Talking about nails ,some time ago in the dutch amateur radio mag. 'Electron' , there was an article describing a kid's radio. ,dubbed 'Nail Radio' . Its construction was on a piece of timber into which copperclad nails had been hammered in circuit diagramme configuration . The components (for this medium wave receiver) were subsequently soldered to the nail heads. A superb way to introduce newcomers to electronics and radio home-brewing. A real circuit "board". Any technique that works, is good technique. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nowadays I prefer using PC board for mounting components. The Al chassis
being upside-down used as a shielded base. In many cases the smaller components can be just soldered together in "basket weave" construction supported by the ones that need to be soldered to the PC-board ground plane. Decades ago Pete Sulzer did his prototypes in full basket-weave style without a ground plane - but few people can visualize ground loops well enough to build RF circuits that way. When you visited his company you'd see his prototypes hanging from nails on the wall. =============== Talking about nails ,some time ago in the dutch amateur radio mag. 'Electron' , there was an article describing a kid's radio. ,dubbed 'Nail Radio' . Its construction was on a piece of timber into which copperclad nails had been hammered in circuit diagramme configuration .. The components (for this medium wave receiver) were subsequently soldered to the nail heads. A superb way to introduce newcomers to electronics and radio home-brewing. Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dead bug" construction means components mounted with legs up. I have not
seen this done with vacuum tube projects. More important than the chassis material is that ground connections come to a common point rather than scattered about the chassis. Ray |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first Heathkit radio used copper-clad steel. I think this is a great
combination for electro-magnetic shielding from low frequencies where you need the ferrous material to high frequencies where you need the highly conductive copper skin. Galvanised steel isn't a bad choice either. Steel is needed if you use the radio in the vicinity of CRT's, computers, etc. Good luck, Tom |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Forsyth" wrote in message ... I recently became interested in trying to build a small two-tube regen type receiver for broadcast and/or shortwave reception. I designed a simple chassis based on some vintage articles on the subject. This is the classic 'metal box with attched front faceplate' design. I was going to use cold-rolled steel since we have this at work and spot weld the face to the main chassis, but then I got to thinking that perhaps the steel might interfere with the coils. I noticed also after this that every old article that I've come across usually suggested aluminum for the chassis. Your articles aren't old enough. After real wooden breadboards went out of style, metal chassis were cadmium-plated steel. Aluminum chassis didn't appear in wide ham use until a few years after WW2. Nowadays I prefer using PC board for mounting components. The Al chassis being upside-down used as a shielded base. In many cases the smaller components can be just soldered together in "basket weave" construction supported by the ones that need to be soldered to the PC-board ground plane. Decades ago Pete Sulzer did his prototypes in full basket-weave style without a ground plane - but few people can visualize ground loops well enough to build RF circuits that way. When you visited his company you'd see his prototypes hanging from nails on the wall. For air-dielectric capacitors: two plates one centimeter on a side, separated by one centimeter equals one picofarad. That's forgetting fringing and other edge effects. Bob C w3otc |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluminum= nice to work with+very light+dose not rust+not really that
expensive -- http://www.qsl.net/sv1hao "David Forsyth" wrote in message ... Hi all, I recently became interested in trying to build a small two-tube regen type receiver for broadcast and/or shortwave reception. I designed a simple chassis based on some vintage articles on the subject. This is the classic 'metal box with attched front faceplate' design. I was going to use cold-rolled steel since we have this at work and spot weld the face to the main chassis, but then I got to thinking that perhaps the steel might interfere with the coils. I noticed also after this that every old article that I've come across usually suggested aluminum for the chassis. They don't make mention of the reasons for this, however. I was wondering if ease of machinability for the amatuer working with simple hand tools, and perhaps also weight savings, were main factors, or was it mainly for lack of magnetic interation with the coils? We also have sheets of aluminum, brass, and stainless that I can use but I'm not sure if they can be resistance welded, so I would have to bolt the face onto the main chassis box. Anyone have any further ideas or insights? thanks in advance, Dave |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluminum= nice to work with+very light+dose not rust+not really that
expensive -- http://www.qsl.net/sv1hao "David Forsyth" wrote in message ... Hi all, I recently became interested in trying to build a small two-tube regen type receiver for broadcast and/or shortwave reception. I designed a simple chassis based on some vintage articles on the subject. This is the classic 'metal box with attched front faceplate' design. I was going to use cold-rolled steel since we have this at work and spot weld the face to the main chassis, but then I got to thinking that perhaps the steel might interfere with the coils. I noticed also after this that every old article that I've come across usually suggested aluminum for the chassis. They don't make mention of the reasons for this, however. I was wondering if ease of machinability for the amatuer working with simple hand tools, and perhaps also weight savings, were main factors, or was it mainly for lack of magnetic interation with the coils? We also have sheets of aluminum, brass, and stainless that I can use but I'm not sure if they can be resistance welded, so I would have to bolt the face onto the main chassis box. Anyone have any further ideas or insights? thanks in advance, Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |