| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\" wrote:
"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message The price penalty is only on items that try to replace or substitute for meat (and often failing miserably). If you simply purchase items such as beans, rice, grains, nuts and so forth, as they exist in nature (or at least, supermarket shelves) then their prices become very low. Last I checked, nuts were more expensive than some meats. And most people haven't got a clue as to how to eat a meat-free diet and get proper nutrition. That's the problem. Well, then don't buy more expensive products and educate yourself about proper nutrition. It's not like this is especially complex or the information particularly difficult to find. Anthony |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Cell Phone Hardline | Antenna | |||
| SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||
| SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||