Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:15:44 -0600, John Fields
wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:54:55 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:42:11 +0000, Scott wrote: Huh? It's only 5:30AM here and I just got up but, the ONLY time you aren't consuming power is at the zero crossing of the voltage and current sine waves (assuming a purely resistive load where I and E are in phase). Since you are paying for power, which is P=I X E, during the negative half cycle, you have, for example, -168 Volts X -1 Amp = +168 Watts...try it on a calculator...negative times a negative is positive. Thanks, Scott. So you're basically agreeing with me. I owe the power co. for the positive cycles they send me; they owe *me* for the negative ones. Since they are equal and opposite, they cancel each other out. Overall, then, zero billing justified. We are being conned!!! --- EUREKA!!! The fallacy lies in your thinking that the power company bills you for what they send you, when in actuality what you're getting billed for is what you send back to them! Consider: they send you a bunch of positive and negative cycles, but as long as you don't turn a switch on anywhere, those cycles can't travel back to the power company, so you don't get billed for them. However, when you do turn on a switch you're providing a way for _their_ electricity to get back to _them_ and stop beating it's head ^^^^ Tsk, tsk, tsk... hangs head in shame _______/ against an open switch, so it seems to me that they should pay _you_ for doing them the courtesy of returning their electricity. -- John Fields |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:52:59 -0600, John Fields
wrote: However, when you do turn on a switch you're providing a way for _their_ electricity to get back to _them_ and stop beating it's head ^^^^ Tsk, tsk, tsk... hangs head in shame _______/ Yes, unusual for you. Watch out for Rich.. ;-) against an open switch, so it seems to me that they should pay _you_ for doing them the courtesy of returning their electricity. That's a pretty solid legal argument. I'll probably incorporate it somewhere into my Writ. -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|