On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:55:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

I have never trolled in any NG.


On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:29:46 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

Once again. Mr.Reay succeeds in scoring an own-goal

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:56:47 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:

Stupid boy. Perhaps it is you who is the troll?


Rather active CB-boy, but I am not convinced about his real interest
to participate in a technical amateur radio newsgroup


---
J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, you've tried and failed miserably to
lead the field with your rather silly outbursts; you've been brought
up short, and are now sulking with silly postings like that of yours
below. Do you not think that childishly broadcast (CB) jibes such
as, "Rather active CB-boy" are at odds with your further comment
relating to "a technical amateur radio newsgroup"? Not only at
odds, but hypocritical?

Insofar as this is a technical NG, do you not think, perhaps, that the
personal attack originated by you below has all the characteristics of
trolling?

Stupid Boy!

"J M Noeding" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:55:58 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:
I have never trolled in any NG.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:29:46 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:
Once again. Mr.Reay succeeds in scoring an own-goal
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:56:47 -0000, "Airy R.Bean"
wrote:
Stupid boy. Perhaps it is you who is the troll?
Rather active CB-boy, but I am not convinced about his real interest
to participate in a technical amateur radio newsgroup

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:13:37 -0000, "Brian Reay"
wrote:

Part of the problem is that people will respond to his rudeness, if you
can't ignore it kill file him. He does it to disrupt the group and he
can
only do so IF WE LET HIM. If we don't let him he can't disrupt the group.
Standard behaviour management.

Very good points.

Having posted what appears to be on the surface a technical item
regarding the construction of capacitors for an ATU, it seems that
Bean has done no calculations whatsoever regarding the design.

Even simple back-of-the-envelope calculations would have pointed up
the the critical areas of component performance, which, together with
an appraisal of the limitations of his chosen resources, may have led
to a more realistic redesign. OTOH it may have indicated or confirmed
the correctness of his original approach. But we'll never know.

But did he respond accordingly? Instead of being an interesting
technical discussion, it has become yet another stick with which to
beat selected responders - the 'gentlemanly traditions' disappearing,
if they ever surfaced at all, very rapidly. One is left with the
strong impression that the original posting wasn't meant to be a
technical discussion at all, and another poster's comment elsewhere
about 'the cycle repeats' appears very apposite.

I note that you have already mentioned what could well be the achilles
heel of Bean's choice of components, and one which I was trying to
gently steer him to in my initial contribution. But it seems that it
is more fun to wield the stick rather than undertake any real design
studies. Ah well.

All signs of insecurity. If Gareth was sure of himself he could debate /
discuss at a technical level. I can't ever actually recall him doing this.

I'm sure there will be a name for his condition, probably even treatment.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898

Brian Reay wrote:



All signs of insecurity. If Gareth was sure of himself he could debate /
discuss at a technical level. I can't ever actually recall him doing this.

I'm sure there will be a name for his condition, probably even treatment.

Yes, it's called Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD).

Google will give you all the info.

Micky

--
E&OE (C) 2005 Micky Taker
Micky Taker accepts no responsibility for any personal injury or
emotional distress that may occur as a result of reading the contents of
this message.

Once again Mr.Reay has published something that has come home
to roost at his home. Remember the following bull**** from
yesterday?.....

"Part of the problem is that people will respond to his rudeness, if you
can't ignore it kill file him. He does it to disrupt the group and he can
only do so IF WE LET HIM. If we don't let him he can't disrupt the group.
Standard behaviour management."


"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

All signs of insecurity. If Gareth was sure of himself he could debate /
discuss at a technical level. I can't ever actually recall him doing this.
I'm sure there will be a name for his condition, probably even treatment.

Once again, Mr.Reay is brandishing his card with
the "insecurity" sneer upon it.

That Mr.Reay feels the need to repeatedly initiate
personal remarks of an aggressive character, personal
remarks that cannot be taken as "debate / discussion at
a technical level", would seem to suggest that it is Mr.Reay
who is insecure, do you not think?

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

All signs of insecurity. If Gareth was sure of himself he could debate /
discuss at a technical level. I can't ever actually recall him doing this.
I'm sure there will be a name for his condition, probably even treatment.

"Brian Reay" wrote:

: Part of the problem is that people will respond to his rudeness, if you
: can't ignore it kill file him. He does it to disrupt the group and he can
: only do so IF WE LET HIM. If we don't let him he can't disrupt the group.
: Standard behaviour management.
said m3osn....


how do you spell NONSENSE anyway ?

"Brian Reay" wrote:

: Part of the problem is that people will respond to his rudeness, if you
: can't ignore it kill file him. He does it to disrupt the group and he can
: only do so IF WE LET HIM. If we don't let him he can't disrupt the group.
: Standard behaviour management.

youve been reading LORD OF THE FLIES again.

havent you ?

ZZZPK wrote:
youve been reading LORD OF THE FLIES again.

Heh, heh, after presenting the play, "Annie", this year
(I was FDR) the Madison County Arts Council asked for ideas
on a play for next year that would employ a bunch of kids.
I suggested, "Lord of the Flies", which met with a very
cool reception. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:31:40 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
I suggested, "Lord of the Flies", which met with a very cool reception. :-)
Didn't Texas send that as a road show to D.C.?