Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MarkAren" wrote in message oups.com... Hi All, I keep noticing something which looks odd to me - I am sure it is correct because this appears to be standard practice, but I would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on the reasons... Take a peek at http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/tx/500w-txt.htm (first example I found). Specifically look at the 5 position switch on the output matching, in position 5, the bulk of the inductor is shorted out. This just looks plain wrong to me. I assume that having shorted turns on an inductor like this drops the Q drastically, or is this the whole point ? Is the same true for roller coaster type variable inductors ? It might cause some small ammount of power loss but it has been done that way in many other amps over the years. Probably not enough loss to notice or others would have done it differantly. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question: HV Variable Caps from Printed Circuit Board | Homebrew | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
Three short simple questions about antennas | Antenna | |||
Address the issues, Skippy! Repost #3 | CB |