Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallestBaird Televisor?)
What is the efficiency of a laser device like nowadays?
I went to a 3D TV IEEE demo back in the 1970's where the device looked like a TV but had "depth". Kind of like those kids puppet theatres! The big thing I remember at the time was the huge power consumption (1000-2000W?) needed to produce even a moderately lit picture. It was said at the time that the appliance would probably never be marketed as a 3DTV in every house would flatten the electricity supply system every time a football/crickrt match was on! I cant quite remember the physics or name behind the 3D technique. Some kind of inteference pattern generation maybe. The name escapes me... Cheers Bob VK2YQA Spike wrote: Powered as it is by AAA cells, it seems to have a greater power, and a greater reserve of power, than those laserpointers powered by watch batteries. The shortest Google search would have turned up the information needed to avoid him making such an obvious statement. A CR2032 battery has a capacity of 220 mAh at a current drain of 0.2 m/A.A modern AAA battery far exceeds that - I've left it as an exercise for the OP to search for that info.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
Your underlying motivatiopn to pooh-pooh makes you
seem like a fool. It is the optical path that determines the divergence, or otherwise of the beam, by dispersion, diffraction, refraction mechanisms, and not the coherence of the radiation. (Cue rejoinder by Mrs.Nugatory, given 5 minutes or so, to look things up on google, to say that monochomatic radiation is unaffected by a dispersive medium.) Brian Reay wrote: "Plod's Conscience" wrote in message oups.com... Allowing for the lens that is used to produce the straight line beam, the spot from the end was easily picked out on a gravestone 1/4 mile away, thus suggesting that a tight beam is being produced. Laser's are coherent sources, the "ASER" stands for Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation- the crucial phenomena in the operation of lasers and masers. The emitted photon is in phase with the stimulating photon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
"Plod's Conscience" wrote in message ups.com... Your underlying motivatiopn to pooh-pooh makes you seem like a fool. Someone offers you genuine information, on topic to your post, and you see it as "pooh-pooh". I can see why you are a "slow learner", to use your own description of yourself. It is the optical path that determines the divergence, or otherwise of the beam, by dispersion, diffraction, refraction mechanisms, and not the coherence of the radiation. Eh, no. A laser will diverge in the absence of a medium. Degree of collimation and coherence both are factors in divergence and you are jumbling together a raft of factors that I supect you don't understand and I know you don't want to learn about. -- 73 Brian www.g8osn.org.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
Your underlying motivation to pooh-pooh and to utter rather
silly and childish remarks makes you seem like a fool. Why do you behave in that way? Brian Reay wrote: Someone offers you genuine information, on topic to your post, and you see it as "pooh-pooh". I can see why you are a "slow learner", to use your own description of yourself. A laser will diverge in the absence of a medium. Degree of collimation and coherence both are factors in divergence and you are jumbling together a raft of factors that I supect you don't understand and I know you don't want to learn about. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
"The Baird system has been superceded by more modern techniques. In
fact, unless you catch up quick, you may miss out a whole generation of technical improvements that have occured since "Stookie" " An offer of genuine information? Or the result of a deeply-seated motivation to want to cause insult? Stupid boy. Brian Reay wrote: Someone offers you genuine information, on topic to your post, and you see it as "pooh-pooh". I can see why you are a "slow learner", to use your own description of yourself. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
Well, you're the expert in behaving like that, and as you
practised it for over 20 years, it probably accounts for it being uppermost in your mind. How come you never managed to pass a 12 WPM Morse Test targetted at 14-year-olds in all that time? Are you, perhaps, too lazy or too stupid, or both? How come your objection to a Morse Code exam being used as a filter to control access to HF suddenly disappeared when a test down at your level, ie, targetted at 6-year-olds, came along? Hypocrisy, perhaps? "Do as I say and not as I do", perhaps? Bull****ting and downright lying, perhaps? Is such two-faced behaviour that to be expected from all directors of the RSCB? Brian Reay wrote: .....a raft of factors that I supect you don't understand and I know you don't want to learn about. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TIME TO RESIGN FROM THE RSCB? (Was : Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?))
Your deep-seated motivation to pooh-pooh just serves to
make you look a fool. If you, as a director of the RSCB unfailingly try to put down discussion, then perhaps it is a sign that any self-respecting _REAL_ Radio Ham should resign from the RSCB? There are many things which have "been done" and yet which you do. (Apart from a Morse Code test that had "been done" by otherwise-unqualified self-taught 14-year-olds). HF Communication had "been done" by thousands, long before you purchased all the Cheque-Book (CB) rigs that you boast about. I don't think that I have ever been "interesed", whatever that may mean. Brian Reay wrote: "Plod's Conscience" wrote in message oups.com... As these beasties come in a mounting that already has facilities for screw fixing, perhaps there is potential capability for optical communications? Been done. UK record, as of a couple of years back at least, was something like 75km. There is project in the latest RSGB handbook (if you are interesed I'll look up the page, I noticed the article but haven't read the detail). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:22:37 GMT, "Brian Reay"
wrote: As these beasties come in a mounting that already has facilities for screw fixing, perhaps there is potential capability for optical communications? Been done. UK record, as of a couple of years back at least, was something like 75km. There is project in the latest RSGB handbook (if you are interesed I'll look up the page, I noticed the article but haven't read the detail). The current UK laser record is around 73km I believe... held by G0MFR and G8LSD. They used standard low power red laser diodes of the kind found in the pointers. Barry,G8AGN, Gordon G0EWN and myself (all in Sheffield) are also experimenting on these lines have done a 45km path so far... using cw. We have some LOS paths up here in the North up to 136km so we're hoping to better the record one day soon :-) Peter, G3PHO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:22:37 GMT, "Brian Reay"
wrote: As these beasties come in a mounting that already has facilities for screw fixing, perhaps there is potential capability for optical communications? Been done. UK record, as of a couple of years back at least, was something like 75km. There is project in the latest RSGB handbook (if you are interesed I'll look up the page, I noticed the article but haven't read the detail). The current UK laser record is around 73km I believe... held by G0MFR and G8LSD. They used standard low power red laser diodes of the kind found in the pointers. Barry,G8AGN, Gordon G0EWN and myself (all in Sheffield) are also experimenting on these lines have done a 45km path so far... using cw. We have some LOS paths up here in the North up to 136km so we're hoping to better the record one day soon :-) Peter, G3PHO |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Optical Communications? RSCB Irrelevance? (Was : The smallest Baird Televisor?)
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Smallest RF-quiet wall wart? | Scanner | |||
Who makes the smallest pocket SW receiver with SSB? | Shortwave | |||
Smallest APRS Tx? | Digital | |||
Smallest APRS Tx? | Digital |