Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 10:31�pm, wrote:
Hi, I wouldn't expect ham numbers to climb dramatically but I would expect to see the Amateur Extra class increase in proportion so that it will be the majority of ***active*** hams, ie active hams seeking out the highest privilege level, this is typically what has happened in other countries that kept multiple tier licenses after 2003. Maybe - but I doubt it will happen. Back in 2000 the FCC reduced both the written and Morse Code testing. Anyone who held a Morse Code tested license could upgrade to Extra with just some written testing - and the amount of written testing was reduced too. Yet here it is seven years later and several hundred thousand hams hold General and Advanced licenses. Surely they aren't all inactive. They just haven't gotten around to passing the written tests yet. *Amateur radio growth is limited by the internet. *We call relatives in Australia via Skype and don't think twice about it, the world is a smaller place and the excitement of radio contact is less. I think that depends on why someone wants to be a radio amateur. IMHO, there are three basic motivations to being a ham: 1) Operating radios 2) Messing around with technology 3) Communicating electronically Most hams are motivated by a mixture of these three. Their relative importance varies with the person. There was a time when the average person's options for electronic/electric communication were very limited. Those days are long gone - not just because of the internet but because of lowcost cell phones and long distance calling. So those who are primarily motivated by 3) aren't going to be hams any more. But 1) and 2) are still going strong. The big difference is that they represent the individual doing something that is *independent* of a big commercial network. Being an operator, not a user. It's a bit like the difference between flying a plane yourself and riding in an airliner. Both get you there, and the airliner is almost certainly faster, safer and less expensive. But it's not the same thing. Ask any pilot. What amateur radio is really all about today is "radio for its own sake". Radio as an end in itself, not a means to an end. That being said, I'm a new Extra and am just setting up a station. Congratulations and welcome! I hope to work you on the air. As for the numbers, I passed my Extra on March 4th and I'm still a General in ULS, so be patient on the numbers. Yup. It will take a while for the dust to settle. The big hamfest/VE session season is only just beginning. Thank you for your effort. You're welcome. Next set of numbers will be in a week or so, then once a month after that, on or around the 23rd of the month. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
IMHO, there are three basic motivations to being a ham: 1) Operating radios 2) Messing around with technology 3) Communicating electronically (4) Was motivated in the past by one or more of the above but now just continues to renew his/her ham license while operating cell phones, sending emails, and posting to r.r.a.* groups. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... wrote: IMHO, there are three basic motivations to being a ham: 1) Operating radios 2) Messing around with technology 3) Communicating electronically (4) Was motivated in the past by one or more of the above but now just continues to renew his/her ham license while operating cell phones, sending emails, and posting to r.r.a.* groups. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com In my opinion there is another motivator. To me, the main fascination is being able to communicate without the need for any infrastructure. All I need is my radio, the stuff to make a basic dipole, a source of power, and my mike or key. Nothing ties us together except the ionosphere. On top of all that, when conditions are moderately good, it can be done with relatively small amounts of power. i.e. It is the ability to basically do this independently. Dee, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee Flint wrote:
In my opinion there is another motivator. To me, the main fascination is being able to communicate without the need for any infrastructure. Good luck at being in the right place at the right time when all other infrastructure fails. I've been a coded ham for 55 years and have yet to use CW for any emergency communications. The only HF emergency communications I ever needed to use was CB. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message t... Dee Flint wrote: In my opinion there is another motivator. To me, the main fascination is being able to communicate without the need for any infrastructure. Good luck at being in the right place at the right time when all other infrastructure fails. I've been a coded ham for 55 years and have yet to use CW for any emergency communications. The only HF emergency communications I ever needed to use was CB. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com I did not mention or imply anything to do with emergency communications or CW. I merely stated that the fascinating part was to be able to contact people without the need for an infrastructure. There is a feeling of independence from being able to, as an individual, communicate around the world. Dee, N8UZE |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
[snip] I did not mention or imply anything to do with emergency communications or CW. I merely stated that the fascinating part was to be able to contact people without the need for an infrastructure. There is a feeling of independence from being able to, as an individual, communicate around the world. Dee, N8UZE I agree. People often ask me why I use 2m & 70cm in the car, for example, when everyone (well, nearly everyone) has a mobile phone (cellphone for you US types..!). I always answer that you can't put a blind CQ call out on a phone. That's the attraction for me, you never know who might reply to a call. 73 Ivor G6URP |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 5:25�pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Dee Flint wrote: In my opinion there is another motivator. *To me, the main fascination is being able to communicate without the need for any infrastructure. Good luck at being in the right place at the right time when all other infrastructure fails. I've been a coded ham for 55 years and have yet to use CW for any emergency communications. The only HF emergency communications I ever needed to use was CB. I was under the impression that the "CW-vs-every other mode" stuff was over. Nes pas? Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I've been a coded ham for 55 years and have yet to use CW for any emergency communications. The only HF emergency communications I ever needed to use was CB. I was under the impression that the "CW-vs-every other mode" stuff was over. My ham experience is mostly limited to CW so I cannot speak for the other modes. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 3:38�pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
In my opinion there is another motivator. *To me, the main fascination is being able to communicate without the need for any infrastructure. *All I need is my radio, the stuff to make a basic dipole, a source of power, and my mike or key. *Nothing ties us together except the ionosphere. *On top of all that, when conditions are moderately good, it can be done with relatively small amounts of power. *i.e. *It is the ability to basically do this independently. Dee, At one time I would put all that under "operating radios", but I think you have hit on something that deserves its own classification. Or at least more words. What you describe is a combination of independence and simplicity. It's partly about not being dependent on a communications infrastructure other than your station, the other station(s), and natural features like the ionosphere, troposphere, etc. It's also partly about the relative simplicity of an amateur station compared to the enormous but largely unseen complexity of other modern communications systems. Sure, I can call Australia on my cell phone - but the cell phone is only one small part of the enormous and complex infrastructure needed to make the call. In amateur radio, the complex infrastructure is replaced by a combination of luck (propagation) and operator skill. This makes for unpredictable communications at times - which is actually a big part of the attraction. When I call CQ, or listen for another's CQ, I don't know who I'll run into, whether I'll contact them or not, etc. IMHO, one of the things many people miss in modern life is a certain feeling of actually doing something start-to-finish. In most jobs nowadays, people are part of a team, or a process, contributing their specialized part to the result. This is how our complex technological society is able to function so efficiently. The downside is that very few people today can point to something in their work and say "I did that, start to finish, all by myself". In fact, many things that people used to do for themselves like car repair/maintenance and fixing things are either too complex for the DIY person, or are not meant to be fixed economically. Amateur radio (and many other DIY activities) offer a way for people to actually do something start-to-finish, all by themselves. That's a key point is 'selling' amateur radio. It's also a big reason behind homebrewing - the homebrewer knows every part of the radio, how it works, and how to fix it. That it may not be state-of-the-art or have all the features of a manufactured item is besides the point. That's something that simply cannot be bought. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
April 22 2007 ARS License Numbers | Policy | |||
ARS License Numbers | Boatanchors | |||
ARS License Numbers | Scanner | |||
ARS License Numbers | Swap | |||
ARS License Numbers | General |