Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the context of the news release quoted below, what does the term "waveform
portability" mean? "FT. WAYNE, Ind. - PrismTech Solutions Americas, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PrismTech Corporation, has been selected to provide waveform portability support to the U.S. Navy's software-defined radio (SDR) systems. The work will be conducted through a support services contract overseen by the U.S. Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR). Scientific Research Corporation (SRC) serves as the prime contractor." -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Homepage: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb Member: ARRL http://www.arrl.org SOC http://www.qsl.net/soc VWOA http://www.vwoa.org A-1 Operator Club http://www.arrl.org/awards/a1-op/ TCDXA http://www.tcdxa.org MWA http://www.w0aa.org TCFMC http://www.tcfmc.org FISTS http://www.fists.org LVDXA http://www.upstel.net/borken/lvdxa.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
In the context of the news release quoted below, what does the term "wa veform portability" mean? http://www.prismtech.com/section-item.asp?id€0 Anyone for another round of "buzzword bingo"? Briefly, it means interoperability. The running joke of course is that "Analog has always been inter operable". In context to the various divergent digital encoding (not encryption) schemes out there. Sort of like a properly designed Java(tm) application working properly regardless of what operating system you're running it on. The military has traditionally been a closed environment with "this project uses this system" which makes passing information between the systems difficult at best. But then, the tower of babel was the original solution to the one world government issue. ;-) Jeff-1.0 wa6fwi |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeffrey D Angus" wrote in message ... KØHB wrote: In the context of the news release quoted below, what does the term "waveform portability" mean? Briefly, it means interoperability. Thanks, Jeff. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:23:26 EDT, "KØHB"
wrote: In the context of the news release quoted below, what does the term "wav eform portability" mean? Hans, as a retired Senior Master Chief, and with your experience in the civilian side of the industry, you are undoubtedly aware that that is a buzzword to justify awarding a contract to some "favorite son" consultant/manufacturer who will deliver equipment that the guys "on the street" so to speak will beta test and find all the bugs and come up with practical solutions that the contractors couldn't think of - stuff that ham operators used to do "back in the day"..... There, I've had my rant..... -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon e-mail: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bad Colpitts osc Waveform | Homebrew | |||
Optimum CW waveform recommendation?? | General | |||
WaveForm Generator | Homebrew | |||
CW keying waveform ? | Equipment | |||
CW keying waveform ? | Equipment |