| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
October 16th 06, 12:17 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
wrote: From: on Fri, Oct 13 2006 7:09pm wrote: From: on Fri, Oct 13 2006 10:15am wrote: From: on Wed, Oct 11 2006 5:56 pm Nothing's changed with you. You still always go after the women folk who have nothing to do with your inability to get along with others. I'm not "going after" anyone, Brain. Sure you are. You go after other people's wives and kids. You have a history of it. Nope. No one's been "gone after". You've gone after my wife. You've gone after my kids before. To say you haven't is a lie. True. The USMC Imposter has gone after my wife, insulted my parents, insulted my wife's universities, insulted just about anything I've mentioned in here. Imposter then says "I lie" since he doesn't know right from wrong. If Robesin adjudicates that someone or thing is wrong, the persecution starts, and there are no legal bounds to his methods. He doesn't know right from wrong. If we say he rightly violates reality (he does), he turns right around and says we do that. It is a non-argument. All it does is delude him in his non-justification of his actions. Its also interesting that when you use one of his tactics on him, he says that justifies him doing it in the first place. Such as Mark out-assholing him. It's a weird, delusional circular-logic thing of his. Yeh, its hard to explain. He is too deluded about himself now to change, though. His postings have the full support of his wife, he says. His behavior is a syndrome of someone who will shortly fall into certifiable insanity. The rubber room is waiting. Perhaps the stainless steel tables in the autopsy room would be better? At least it can be sanitized. He quotes himself in here, then claims I have misquoted him. That's all in his delusional syndrome. There is no logic in the stuff he says. What he "sees" on his screens seems to be different than what everyone else sees. It is all part of his delusion. If he would quit forging the attributes maybe he could keep it all straight. Imposter is traveling to Amish country of Pennsylvania? It's on the way to the Dayton Hamvention. Ah so! :-) He'll have to file a travel voucher requesting circuitious travel. "Circuitous," as in traveling in circles. :-) The shoelace on his jump boots is caught on something. Imposter is going to NJ to learn methods of offing patients from a nurse there who did it? Sounds like a circle-jerk in the making. Imposter may have already started in TN? Did the Man-Nurse in NJ ever get convicted? I think so. Leastways, he was arrested and had a hearing with a psych exam ordered. Elfren Saldivar, the "angel of death" at a Glendale, CA, hospital, was tried and convicted (with reasons of insanity) and is very locked up now. Good. We need to keep these crazies off the streets and out of our health care systems. I know, I know...but if I call him an asshole, I'm insulting the real assholes! They will be highly offended. I hearby apologize for any unintended future use of "asshole" to all the OTHER real assholes in here. :-) That should cover just about everyone. Thousands of posts worth of insults and failure to discern right from wrong...not to mention the infamous IMPOSTER of the USMC act carried on for years...years in which the Imposter NEVER supplied a single item of proof, not even a snapshot of himself on "active duty" during 18 years. He was probably in "Secret Ops." No photos allowed. It was so "secret" that all documents were marked "burn before reading..." :-) Wonder if he ever used the Code Name "Mr. Phelps?" Could be...except there is another "Jim" in here. :-) In the Imposter's case he still screwed up...the tape self-destructed BEFORE he heard it... :-) Singed his mustache? Is Paul going to let you play "Excrement Commando" in RRAP? Probably he will. The hell he will. We will have to wait and see... I'll give him the benefit... I give Paul NO "benefit." I've gone round-and-around with him both in public and private. That gives me a good feeling of how he will "moderate" this group. It will just end up with the Coders patting each other on the back for their heroics. At best that "recourse" would be NOT posting and NOT accessing the newsgroup. There is NO sign that anyone "in charge" today or the last few years has done anything in regards to "offensive" postings. There is a curious, prolonged NON-response in Google whenever anyone clicks on their message option button. Long delayed echoes... (RADAR term involving range folding). Parts of Google are doing "stealth" handling? Ever since they bought out DejaNews they've fallen down on handling newsgroups. Not just in RRAP but other groups. I never was able to find Heil's comments about Veteran's always having their hands out. Besides, the Code Test issue is moments away from being resolved. Might not even be done this year. The R&O on the "omnibus" issue began in 2004 and didn't get settled until 2006. The code test NPRM of last year (05-235) might be handled in 2007. True, but in ham-years, that is is just a blink away. I passed my Novice exams twenty (20) years ago this month and the Old-Timers still classify me as a newbie. In the minds of some olde-tymers they think they invented ham radio. shrug Even Hiram didn't invent ham radio. On a trip a couple years ago, I met an "old-timer" ham who was in his mid-fifties. He went on and on and on about ham radio, straight from the Book of St. Hiram, sounding off as if all around him were clueless civilians. I didn't say too much at first, but began with some of his claims...and demolished each one by the referencible facts of the radio-electronics industry and military electronics-radio. Finally he got down to his "trump card" which was He was "federally authorized to transmit by the government!" I happened to have my old First 'Phone ID card in my wallet along with IEEE membership card (current) and showed that, adding that He was NOT authorized to transmit OUTSIDE of the ham bands on "shortwave." [I couldn't believe he still used that old term "shortwave" instead of HF] Well, hell, Len, they ARE shorter than our ONE (1) MW band! Through all of that I was cool and collected and never personally insulted him. His reaction was AS IF I did. I had to defuse the non-discussion for the sake of the host. Pity that for this guy was really looking for a personal combat situation, By chance was he wearing a flight suit? but was a bit too sloshed to pose any physical threat to me. Moral of this story is that there are lots of those self-important hams who are hams mostly for the rank-status-privilege of that "federal authorization" and have lost any sense of cameraderie or fun of just communications with other hobbyists. The Imposter is just another common carbon-copy of that mid-life-crisis guy, but one on speed or uppers. Mitty sure gets around. A real head case he is... He's nuts. I agree but there are others in here who must have ABSOLUTES to justify such opinions. If he's not "nuts" in the absolute sense, he will be soon. He's nuts now. OK. :-) |
|
#3
October 16th 06, 01:59 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm
wrote: From: on Fri, Oct 13 2006 7:09pm wrote: From: on Fri, Oct 13 2006 10:15am wrote: From: on Wed, Oct 11 2006 5:56 pm Its also interesting that when you use one of his tactics on him, he says that justifies him doing it in the first place. Such as Mark out-assholing him. It's a weird, delusional circular-logic thing of his. Yeh, its hard to explain. He is too deluded about himself now to change, though. His postings have the full support of his wife, he says. Which one, I wonder? He's paid alimony to the first, makes nice-nice claims about his second's amateur license, but it probably in some delusional phase thinking about wifey #3 that doesn't exist. However, he IS condoned by all the amateur extras in here with exceptions only of Hans and Alun. He is "A-OK" with Jimmie Noserve and that Waffen SS guy... His behavior is a syndrome of someone who will shortly fall into certifiable insanity. The rubber room is waiting. Perhaps the stainless steel tables in the autopsy room would be better? At least it can be sanitized. Well, he could come out here and hire on as a "corpse" on one of the CSI shows. [all three are mostly filmed here in southern California...:-) ] He quotes himself in here, then claims I have misquoted him. That's all in his delusional syndrome. There is no logic in the stuff he says. Such might exist in his delusional Stevieworld...? What he "sees" on his screens seems to be different than what everyone else sees. It is all part of his delusion. If he would quit forging the attributes maybe he could keep it all straight. He can't keep himself straight. Just think, 18 years in a supposed career and he has NO documentation of it, not even a snapshot! Imposter is traveling to Amish country of Pennsylvania? It's on the way to the Dayton Hamvention. Ah so! :-) He'll have to file a travel voucher requesting circuitious travel. "Circuitous," as in traveling in circles. :-) The shoelace on his jump boots is caught on something. Yeah, a hole in his tooth... Imposter is going to NJ to learn methods of offing patients from a nurse there who did it? Sounds like a circle-jerk in the making. Imposter may have already started in TN? Did the Man-Nurse in NJ ever get convicted? I think so. Leastways, he was arrested and had a hearing with a psych exam ordered. Elfren Saldivar, the "angel of death" at a Glendale, CA, hospital, was tried and convicted (with reasons of insanity) and is very locked up now. Good. We need to keep these crazies off the streets and out of our health care systems. ...they keep entering, though. :-( Thousands of posts worth of insults and failure to discern right from wrong...not to mention the infamous IMPOSTER of the USMC act carried on for years...years in which the Imposter NEVER supplied a single item of proof, not even a snapshot of himself on "active duty" during 18 years. He was probably in "Secret Ops." No photos allowed. It was so "secret" that all documents were marked "burn before reading..." :-) Wonder if he ever used the Code Name "Mr. Phelps?" Could be...except there is another "Jim" in here. :-) In the Imposter's case he still screwed up...the tape self-destructed BEFORE he heard it... :-) Singed his mustache? Seems to have gotten his head hair instead... I give Paul NO "benefit." I've gone round-and-around with him both in public and private. That gives me a good feeling of how he will "moderate" this group. It will just end up with the Coders patting each other on the back for their heroics. Sigh...a whole newsgroup devoted to MORSE MYTHS. :-( True, but in ham-years, that is is just a blink away. I passed my Novice exams twenty (20) years ago this month and the Old-Timers still classify me as a newbie. In the minds of some olde-tymers they think they invented ham radio. shrug Even Hiram didn't invent ham radio. Really? :-) I guess we need a "clarification" on that from Mister ham radio, Jimmie Noserve. He always claims the "correct" definition on just about everything. :-) Through all of that I was cool and collected and never personally insulted him. His reaction was AS IF I did. I had to defuse the non-discussion for the sake of the host. Pity that for this guy was really looking for a personal combat situation, By chance was he wearing a flight suit? Heh heh heh...no such luck. His faded summer shirt had some kind of red sauce spilled on it. The Imposter is just another common carbon-copy of that mid-life-crisis guy, but one on speed or uppers. Mitty sure gets around. Hmmm... "What goes around comes around?" [perish the thought!] |
|
#4
October 16th 06, 08:19 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
|
|
#5
October 16th 06, 12:53 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm The Imposter is just another common carbon-copy of that mid-life-crisis guy, but one on speed or uppers. Mitty sure gets around. Hmmm... "What goes around comes around?" [perish the thought!] I believ in karma but I truly hope that the Procoder do not have to endue what simple justice says they should endure for there decades of outright opression they have been party to Even if there is karma, they won't understand it or tie it to their unreasonable desire to make everyone learn code. Id like to move on but I am sure the Procoders will never allow that Ignore the spoil-sports. The actuarial tables will eventually silence them. |
|
#6
October 16th 06, 12:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
|
|
#7
October 16th 06, 11:37 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
|
|
#8
October 17th 06, 12:32 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
|
|
#9
October 19th 06, 03:57 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:32pm
wrote: Even though Jim posts with authority, not all of his postings are factual. Give us an example. You GOT the "example." He went into fantasy orgasm on ENIAC of 1946. Just stating facts, Len. Nothing I stated about that machine was incorrect. You copied off the Moore School website PR material. In itself that material is either incomplete or erroneous...such as the extravagant claim that "ENIAC changed the world." The FACT is that tomorrow, Thursday, 19 October, marks the 33rd anniversary of a federal court decision on who had the first electronic computer. The judge's decision was that Iowa State University had it, the Atanasoff-Berry Computer (familiarly called "ABC"). Not only that, court transcripts indicate that John Mauchly had already seen the "ABC" but talked to both Atanasoff and Berry in detail on that "ABC." Further, Mauchly and Atanasoff exchanged mail following Mauchly's trip to Iowa to see the "ABC." If you wish to see more and in detail on the REAL "first electronic computer," just go to: http://www.iastate.edu And follow the links. There's many pages of information on the "ABC" plus that famous trial about "the ENIAC patents." Sperry-Rand (who had purchased the rights to the ENIAC patents) LOST that trial. TS for Sperry-Rand. Not only that, the judge chided Mauchly in his decision paper, stating that Mauchly had taken a priori knowledge from the "ABC" and tried to pass it off as "his" for the ENIAC. As for the ABC, it was not completely electronic. Really?!? WTF are you talking about? Look at the Iowa State "ABC" pages. Nice illustrations of it. More importantly, the original was never completed. "Never completed?!?" WTF are you talking about? It was "completed" in the 1939 to 1942 period. As far as a federal court is concerned it was most definitely COMPLETED, completed well enough for the judge to declare it, the "ABC", was the FIRST electronic computer. [TRY to get used to that, Jimmie, I know it is damn difficult for you but for 33 years the "first" electronic computer title has gone to the Atanasoff- Berry Computer of 1939] ENIAC was fully operational for over a decade - NOT "fully operational" by Moore School or the short- lived 'company' of Mauchly and Eckert (they went broke and Sperry-Rand had to bail them out by buying rights to the machine). The US Army took it over (having paid for it in the first place) and John Von Neuman suggested the Army should CHANGE certain parts of it. ENIAC was *NOT* the "First" electronic computer. Get used to it. ABC was not finished until 1998. Bull****. What *I* described was a REPLICA. Built by the Computer Sciences Department of Iowa State. Between 1942 and about 1994 (a mere 52 years), the original "ABC" had been scrounged for parts for other projects. All that remained of the original (in the 1990s) was one memory drum. Atanasoff and Berry kept good notes and diagrams, even wrote some internal papers about the "ABC." Those were used to build the REPLICA. "ABC" used a revolving drum holding capacitors for electronic memory storage...each capacitor storing one binary bit. "ABC" had a "recharge" section which would keep the bit capacitors' charges up for as long as it was on. Note: In the 1939-1942 time frame there was no such thing as a magnetic memory drum to use by anyone. [magnetic recording was not yet mature in that time frame, but it was available...barely] Atanasoff and Berry had to use what was available. "High-speed" mass memory didn't exist until the invention of the "Williams tube" in the UK, the one using a CRT faceplate with conductive foil in small patches on it to form an equivalent charge storage for each bit. ENIAC was NEVER replicated in its original form. At best is a Moore School internal project for "ENIAC on a chip," putting the whole thing on a single IC. That info is on the ENIAC website, perhaps of interest, perhaps not since Intel had the FIRST CPU-on-a-chip decades ago. But the original ABC was never fully operational, nor complete. It was COMPLETE. It was FULLY OPERATIONAL as to its intended tasks. The "ABC" was intended to be used to solve certain problems. It did that. While it was NEVER intended to solve "all-purpose" computing problems (as if the modern mainframes had existed in 1939 to use as a model of that), it was FULLY OPERATIONAL enough for a court to decide which electronic computer was FIRST. Doesn't change the validity of what I wrote. The ENIAC was completed and operational by 1946. ABC was not. False. Firstly, YOU NEVER mentioned the "ABC." Secondly, "ABC" was completed and operational by 1942, four years prior to the ENIAC first running. The patent in question was not relevant to which machine was the first general purpose, high speed, electronic digital computer. The TIME FRAME is the relevant item, Jimmie, the TIME FRAME. 1939 to 1942 is WELL BEFORE the ENIAC. Further, John Mauchly essentially committed intellectual property theft of certain aspects of "ABC" to use in ENIAC. Trashcan the "high speed" adjectives for ENIAC, Jimmie. It is NOT "high speed" at all. It was slower in operation than my Apple ][+ of 1980. It was slower than ALL of the first personal electronic computers made in the 1960s and 1970s. "Programming" of ENIAC sometimes "took weeks" for a single task according to some REAL computer history sites and textbooks. That sort of SELECTIVE highlighting with the sin of omission or related facts is what the ARRL does most of the time. That's just sour graoes in your part, Len. Completely untrue. I've never tasted a "sour graoe." What is it? The ARRL *DOES* 'sin by omission' of lots of radio-electronic history. 'Sin of omission' refers to mentioning ONLY what the ARRL thinks is relevant for amateur radio and to make prospective members think they can join a completely 'honest' organization. ARRL is also a POLITICAL ENTITY, Jimmie, it lobbies for things *it* wants, but says what it wants is "for the good of amateur radio." [typical POLITICAL spin] Sorry, Jimmie, but what I wrote *IS* completely TRUE. Try untwisting your knickers a bit and quit trying to defend the ARRL as if you were an army of one. [you've never served in any military, don't know how to fight for your or anyone else's life] ARRL *IS* a political entity and deserves every comment it gets, good or bad. |
|
#10
October 18th 06, 11:06 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
wrote:
From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm Or maybe she's a figment of his imagination and Robesin would have to roll out her old RRAP account when he's much too busy creating new accounts for our geophysicist visitors. "Geophysicists?" :-) Why sure, Leonard. Your pal, Col. Mark Morgan has now confessed to being a geophysicist. From some of his message headers, he is missing his id. Must have missed those. shrug Hawaii is the new rock-and-roll state. Newington, CT, will ignore it as it does all other things west of the Mississippi River... There aren't many of your posts in which you don't tell some outright falsehood. Both CNN and Fox News carried accounts of cellular phone service being disrupted. I'll bet some of those radio hams end up handling communication in the aftermath of the earthquake. Texas is west of the Mississippi. Do you think hams will be a part of the action in the wake of the flooding there? For years he has tried to avoid posting anything anywhere to document his alleged 18-year active USMC career. He won't even make it available as private e-mail. I served in the military only four years, Len. I've posted nothing here in documenting my active duty service. I've not, nor would I ever make any such documentation available to you in an e-mail. Look what kind of things you've written about my active duty military service. Go figure! That sort of SELECTIVE highlighting with the sin of omission or related facts is what the ARRL does most of the time. Naturally, those who attended the "parochial school" of the Church of St. Hiram will pick up on the technique. You haven't attended catechism studies and haven't been confirmed. You don't pledge, you don't tithe. You may not partake. You're still an unbaptized heathen in the world of amateur radio. Dave K8MN |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Direct Question for Brian P Burke, N0IMD. | Policy | |||
| Embarrassing Moments Caught on Tape | Scanner | |||
Hybrid Mode
