Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Dee Flint" on Sat, Oct 28 2006 10:27pm
wrote in message Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message [snip] I can't help but think that all engineers, aerospace or civil or otherwise, had to learn Ohm's Law as part of "thier" professional certification. If I am wrong, then shame on the state of American Engineerism, and shame on America. No wonder we're overrun with engineers from India, Pakistan, China and Russia. Mechanical engineers don't have a need for Ohm's law. They go hire the electrical engineers. Really? That's NOT been my experience over the last half century in the Los Angeles Aerospace Industry. I've NEVER been hired by any mechanical engineers...the final interview before a hiring okay has ALWAYS been done by EEs. Aerospace engineering is a branch of mechanical engineering (we don't get to drop the lesser terms in the equations since they have a significant impact for our field). Really? Rocketdyne (my last big corporate employer) makes the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine). A rocket motor (simple) might need a spark plug or other igniter to start it up (if not using hypergolic fuel). However, each SSME has a STRAP- ON COMPUTER, primarily to regulate the liquid oxygen flow. Can't use a conventional flowmeter...the LOX just eats them up (rapid oxidation from pure oxygen). Since the SSME is throttleable there's a wide range of variables involved, something that can only be solved in real time by a computer. Computer was designed and built by Minneapolis-Honeywell and is probably the MOST robust computer ever made. Perhaps you want to argue that Rocketdyne is "not" involved in aerospace engineering? [feel free, but you would be WRONG] If you go a bit north of Rocketdyne in Canoga Park, CA, you would reach Hughes Aircraft Missle Division. Nice place. I worked there when Ramo-Wooldridge occupied that facility. Stouffers ran both the RW and HAC cafeteria, good good food. Is the Phoenix air-air missle considered part of "aerospace?" I'd say so, and thousands of other engineers would say so. However, for a missle there is a STRONG interplay between the tin benders and solder slingers to get an optimum package with the most bang for its buck...and get it to the target RELIABLY. HAC has had an excellent record in air-air misslery, beginning with their first, the GAR-1 and GAR-2 (launched from F-102s, Shrub's NG plane). Air-air missles NEED little computers on board along with air data sensors and control acuators to do their task. A mechanical who specializes in aerodynamics is certainly needed but those would be out of a job without the electronics specialist working side-by-side. Would a satellite or space probe work without solar cells? [only for a short time] Solar cells are ELECTRICAL things, charging up the internal batteries (another electrical thing) to keep the payload (electronics) working. Feel free to go out to JPL and tell them "aerospace is all mechanical engineering." :-) I could expand on avionics...stuff that acquires and tracks targets (military) or guides aircraft (military and civilian) or does "fly-by-wire" (control surface acuation via electrical coupling from manual controls). Absolutely needed in the high-performance aircraft of today. But, you say that is due to "aerospace being all mechanical engineering?" No. Have you seen the "glass cockpit" of today's aircraft? Gone are the mechanical and aerodynamic gauges, replaced with flat-screen LCD and Plasma displays operated through microprocessors from sensors with no moving parts. Again we go hire the electrical engineers. Nonsense. Same with civil and structural engineers. More nonsense. "Civil engineers?" Building rigid airships? :-) On the other hand electrical engineers generally do not study basic pressure vessal theory but go hire the mechanical engineers for that. I might have had some past jobs that made me a 'vassal' but at Rocketdyne I never had any responsibility for pressure VESSLES. That was for the smoke-and-fire guys to do. :-) By the way, the almost-catastrophy of the Apollo 13 mission was a LOX tank blowing up in the Service Module. Specifially it was failure of the LOX stirring thermostate within it, a design responsibility of mechanicals with thermodynamics specialty. :-) [one of three VESSLES holding LOX in the Service Module] Learning Oh,'s Law for a hobby is one thing, but a professional engineer........ Again it depends on the field. We all studied common areas such as calculus and fast fourier transforms but items unique to a field generally were not taught across the board. Tsk, tsk. Bad school. Sit in corner. :-) We didn't study Ohms law and the electrical engineers didn't study cantilever beam theory. Really? "Beam theory" (cantilever and others) was a REQUISITE in southern California colleges; most instructors prolly couldn't hack the basic electrical stuff anyway. Ever look into a Texas Instruments 'DLP' IC? CANTILEVER BEAM MOVEMENT of the micromachined mirrors does every single lil' pixel in that IC. TI has a virtual monopoly on the DLP for very large screen DTV displays. One need not use 'cantilever beam theory' to design a horizontal ham antenna (such as a parasitic beam)...just go out and BUY one, ready-made, some-assembly-required, then watch it fall down in the next big windstorm. :-) --- As far as actual KNOWLEDGE gained, a 'degree' has LITTLE value except in the eyes of personnel departments and department managers (the ones who think they can run people but sure don't know how to run the equipment). I finally got one...LONG AFTER the fact of having quite a bit of design responsibility and a whole heaping gob of experience. Personally, I feel mine is a negative worth due to lots of LOST time attending 'requisite' classes...just so a few instructors could write down I passed their courses and a few others in a college (or university) could rubber-stamp a 'sheepskin.' The point is BEING ABLE TO DO THE JOB, not the number of diplomas (suitable for framing) on display, or the number of alphabetic characters one can put after a signature. Does anyone NEED a radio license to effectively run, repair, maintain, calibrate, test a radio transmitter? NO. The license is a LEGAL requirement. The TEST for any radio license, amateur or commercial, is ridiculously SIMPLE, and has NEVER been made complex or comprehensive by the FCC. It is an AUTHORIZATION by a government agency, NOT a "qualification". It might as well be a fancy hunting or fishing license. However, the FCC regulations for radio amateurs is strict on technical performance, a responsibility for EACH licensee. Can you do any sort of comprehensive test to insure compliance with the LAW? I can. I could long before any degree was received. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: "Dee Flint" on Sat, Oct 28 2006 10:27pm wrote in message Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message If you go a bit north of Rocketdyne in Canoga Park, CA, you would reach Hughes Aircraft Missle Division. "Missile", Len. prove postive of 2 thing DX is running poorly tonight and Heil has nothing worthwhile to say |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: "Dee Flint" on Sat, Oct 28 2006 10:27pm wrote in message Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message If you go a bit north of Rocketdyne in Canoga Park, CA, you would reach Hughes Aircraft Missle Division. "Missile", Len. prove postive of 2 thing DX is running poorly tonight and Heil has nothing worthwhile to say Heil hasn't said anything worthwhile in this newsgroup for years. But he wants to run for ARRL office. Perhaps he's found his calling? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hey BB did steve do somethign specail toy uo laely? | Policy | |||
More News of Radio Amateurs' Work in the Andamans | Shortwave | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Broadcasting | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |