wrote in message
ps.com...
FCC announced today that Element 1, the 5 wpm Morse Code test, will no
longer be required for
any class of US amateur license. Technicians will get Technician Plus
privileges.

See news item on

www.fcc.gov

The effective date of this change isn't clear but should be soon.

73 de Jim, N2EY

at laest now I can finaly bring my cursade to hf finaly an roberson cant stp
me this time. tood wil be glad two have me abroad on thi isue. we will shunt
dopwn nim buster two
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:13:24 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On 15 Dec 2006 17:34:45 -0800, wrote:

FCC announced today that Element 1, the 5 wpm Morse Code test, will no
longer be required for
any class of US amateur license. Technicians will get Technician Plus
privileges.

See news item on

www.fcc.gov

The effective date of this change isn't clear but should be soon.

73 de Jim, N2EY



YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEESSSSSSS
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Didn't you already know that, duffus?

Tom yesterday evening was the first sabbat of Hanukah as I was leading
services I spent the day preparing for that
show-na-to-va (that is the greeting for this time of year as JEW rendered
phonicticaly)
happy new years it means and it can be better one if Wismen Robson and SC a
few just decided to not to be as hateful with the punce gotcha

I lerned of the news when I logged and checked RRAP
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 15 Dec 2006 17:34:45 -0800, wrote:

FCC announced today that Element 1, the 5 wpm Morse Code test, will no
longer be required for
any class of US amateur license. Technicians will get Technician Plus
privileges.

See news item on

www.fcc.gov

The effective date of this change isn't clear but should be soon.

As I'm sure many of us are already aware, the procedure with these
things is that the rule changes take effect 30 days after they have
been publisheds in the Federal Register. Once the R&O shows up in the
Federal Register, the 30-day countdown begins.

On Day 31, presumably, those who hold a Technician Class license
without Element 1 credit gain some operating privileges on HF, and the
rest of us have the opportunity to add some new callsigns to our logs.

John D. Kasupski, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York
http://kc2hmz.net

wrote:
wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim

Now, perhaps, everyone can put this code vs no code thing behind us.

I can put the issue away, but not some of the hard feelings developed
along the way. There are several individuals on this group that I
would never care to meet on the air or in person.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the group can quiet down a bit and get back to more
serious discussions ...

Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service.

There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just
plain wrong.

sure there is you have often said as do most of the ProCoders that the
NoCode would be followed your proposal to end testing

we arre awaiting you ideas on the subject

I'm
sure he's eager to roll that one out again.

I can't roll out what doesn't exist.




73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:00:48 -0500, wrote:

I read it differently since the FCC has the power to act with imedaint
effect

True, the FCC does have the power to order the changes to become
effective upon release.

Whether or not this is the case with respect to the actions contained
in the public notice was not made clear in the public notice.

Therefore, I suspect Bill Cross is going to find a significant number
of new e-mails and his phone ringing off the hook when he arrives for
work on Monday morning.

John D. Kasupski, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York
http://kc2hmz.net

John Smith wrote in :

wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.


Hey John,

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

- 73 de Mike -

an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim

Now, perhaps, everyone can put this code vs no code thing behind us.

I can put the issue away, but not some of the hard feelings developed
along the way. There are several individuals on this group that I
would never care to meet on the air or in person.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the group can quiet down a bit and get back to more
serious discussions ...

Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service.

There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just
plain wrong.

sure there is you have often said

Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am
aware of.

as do most of the ProCoders that the
NoCode would be followed your proposal to end testing

They think that there might as well be no testing at all now that the
code exam is gone. They sure don't value the writtens very much, do
they?

we arre awaiting you ideas on the subject

What ideas? He just wanted to dump the written.

Mike Coslo wrote:
John Smith wrote in :

wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.


Hey John,

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

- 73 de Mike -

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 18 Dec 2006 03:52:43 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

ore desperate diverasion steve

A WHAT, Morkie...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ