wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:
wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.

Regards,
JS

The "Gay Agenda" is Steven J. Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP/Tennessee Nurse who
mines the internet and brings back to this amateur newsgroup things
which have no place here.

John Smith wrote in :

wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.


Hey John,

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

- 73 de Mike -

Mike Coslo wrote:
John Smith wrote in :

wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
Hello, Jim
...
serious discussions ...
...
73 de Jim, N2EY


Only if moderation is used in moderation have I ever seen it to be
successful, else the newsgroup goes the way of CW and only a few
devotees participate. However, it just might be worth it to be rid of
the "gay agenda" who plague usenet these days.


Hey John,

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

- 73 de Mike -

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

Am I really anonymous?

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

Am I really anonymous?

No, Brian, you are not anonymous. Anyone who's been here a
year or so will know that. For those short-timers, your call is
N 0 I M D (using spaces to make it clearer to the hate-filled
near-sighted twits).

Major Dud is running out of "reasons" for personally insulting
others so he has resorted to his old, false, outdated "SIGNING"
charge.

A written communications medium such as on Usenet already
IDs the user in the header information. Robesin doesn't
understand any of that...he still thinks he is in some kind of
cue-so on the radio and the "signing" must be the callsign.
Poor feller doesn't understand the difference between Usenet
over the Internet and amateur radio parlance-protocol-procedure.

Sigh...there's no end to the behavior of Robesin in sight and
2007 will open up just another barrage of hate-filled, frustrated
insults from Him. Unless he gets a job in another hospital to
end his "vacation." :-)

Best regards,

wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I'm seriously converted to Xnews! You might want to give it a try. It even
converted *this* group to hetero (at least I didn't have to see it) ;^)
They can keep changin their names, but Xnews makes pretty short work of
'em.

Hello Mike. I guess you didn't do the BBS thing after all, and have
used "Xnews" to rehabilitate this newsgroup. So what alias have you
been posting under?

As for aliases, why are you still not signing YOUR posts, Brain?

Steve, K4YZ

Am I really anonymous?

No, Brian, you are not anonymous. Anyone who's been here a
year or so will know that. For those short-timers, your call is
N 0 I M D (using spaces to make it clearer to the hate-filled
near-sighted twits).

Sheesh! I'm supposed to be anonymous and everyone knows who I am!!!
I'm a complete failure as an anonninnie.

Major Dud is running out of "reasons" for personally insulting
others so he has resorted to his old, false, outdated "SIGNING"
charge.

He'll never run out of claims. They're all he's got.

A written communications medium such as on Usenet already
IDs the user in the header information. Robesin doesn't
understand any of that...he still thinks he is in some kind of
cue-so on the radio and the "signing" must be the callsign.
Poor feller doesn't understand the difference between Usenet
over the Internet and amateur radio parlance-protocol-procedure.

His sintax has him confused.

Sigh...there's no end to the behavior of Robesin in sight and
2007 will open up just another barrage of hate-filled, frustrated
insults from Him. Unless he gets a job in another hospital to
end his "vacation." :-)

2007 is just another chapter in the Robesin saga.

Best regards,



HNY.