Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
Len, you used to argue that ham radio would benefit if only the FCC would let the brilliant RF scientists, engineers and physicists, who only lacked the ability or desire to learn Morse code, to enter the service. Well, I personally know such an "RF scientist" who, when I emailed him about element 1 going away, expressed interest in getting a ham license. About 10 years ago he ran a test lab that tested HDTV broadcast methods. Gave him a web site of practice tests, so he'd know ham radio specific regulations (what bands, power limits and such that cannot be derived from RF theory) and know what to expect when he does take the tests. But he's not a young guy. The ARRL ought to place a few advertisements in the various RF trade journals, to get the word out. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert casey wrote:
Stefan Wolfe wrote: Len, you used to argue that ham radio would benefit if only the FCC would let the brilliant RF scientists, engineers and physicists, who only lacked the ability or desire to learn Morse code, to enter the service. Well, I personally know such an "RF scientist" who, when I emailed him about element 1 going away, expressed interest in getting a ham license. About 10 years ago he ran a test lab that tested HDTV broadcast methods. Gave him a web site of practice tests, so he'd know ham radio specific regulations (what bands, power limits and such that cannot be derived from RF theory) and know what to expect when he does take the tests. But he's not a young guy. The ARRL ought to place a few advertisements in the various RF trade journals, to get the word out. Good thinking! Liked your band too ... Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith I" wrote in message ... robert casey wrote: Stefan Wolfe wrote: Len, you used to argue that ham radio would benefit if only the FCC would let the brilliant RF scientists, engineers and physicists, who only lacked the ability or desire to learn Morse code, to enter the service. Well, I personally know such an "RF scientist" who, when I emailed him about element 1 going away, expressed interest in getting a ham license. About 10 years ago he ran a test lab that tested HDTV broadcast methods. Gave him a web site of practice tests, so he'd know ham radio specific regulations (what bands, power limits and such that cannot be derived from RF theory) and know what to expect when he does take the tests. But he's not a young guy. The ARRL ought to place a few advertisements in the various RF trade journals, to get the word out. Good thinking! Liked your band too ... Regards, JS Well I'd suggest posing the proposal to the ARRL and suggest to them to fund it by having a special drive rather like what they do for the Spectrum Defense Fund. It's doubtful that they have sufficient unallocated dollars in the current budget to place these ads. Suggesting it here in rrap isn't going to do a thing. Dee, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Code Free "It's part of the dumbing down of America," accordingto CDC | Policy | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |