"an_old_friend" wrote:

well man of a thousand callsign how does it FEEL to be the
only RRAPer known the have had the FCC act aginst him.

Which Part 97 rule did I violate, Morkie? I don't seem to ever recall
getting a pink slip from the FCC telling me I've violated Part 97.


I certainly have never receieved any letter from
them myself

Probably due to the fact, as someone else pointed out, your address is
gibberish.


and code testing is supoosed to weed out the bad one .
so I guess you are just another case where it FAILED

Where have I stated code testing weeds out anyone?

Well... For years it weeded YOU out... so that certainly was a good thing,
IMO.

KH6HZ wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:

well man of a thousand callsign how does it FEEL to be the
only RRAPer known the have had the FCC act aginst him.

Which Part 97 rule did I violate, Morkie?

"Good Amateur Practice."

I don't seem to ever recall
getting a pink slip from the FCC telling me I've violated Part 97.

Riley says good amatuer practice is enforceable. He enforced it on
you.

I certainly have never receieved any letter from
them myself

Probably due to the fact, as someone else pointed out, your address is
gibberish.

Only Riley is to judge. Meanwhile, Deignan has addresses scattered
across the USA and perhaps several US possessions, courtesy of Coast
Guard friednds...

and code testing is supoosed to weed out the bad one .
so I guess you are just another case where it FAILED

Where have I stated code testing weeds out anyone?

Below.

Well... For years it weeded YOU out... so that certainly was a good thing,
IMO.

Mark has been a ham for years.

wrote:

"Good Amateur Practice."

No communication I ever received from the FCC ever cited "good amateur
practice".


Riley says good amatuer practice is enforceable. He enforced
it on you.

Cite anywhere in communications addressed from the FCC to me the words "good
amateur practice". Sorry, doesn't exist.


Only Riley is to judge. Meanwhile, Deignan has addresses
scattered across the USA and perhaps several US possessions,
courtesy of Coast Guard friednds...

Or, could be having my own private jet affords me the luxury of easy
interstate travel.


Mark has been a ham for years.

Alas, even RoundUp doesn't kill all the weeds you spray it on, so I suppose
we can't expect the code-test to keep out all the undesirables, huh?

On Jan 23, 12:07 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
"Good Amateur Practice."

No communication I ever received from the FCC ever cited "good amateur
practice".

No, it would cite the items which were poor amateur practice, like
scarfing up a lot of callsigns...

Riley says good amatuer practice is enforceable. He enforced
it on you.Cite anywhere in communications addressed from the FCC to me the words "good
amateur practice". Sorry, doesn't exist.

The words, "good amateur practice" do not have to appear on the
communication.

It is enforceable, none-the-less.

Only Riley is to judge. Meanwhile, Deignan has addresses
scattered across the USA and perhaps several US possessions,
courtesy of Coast Guard friends...

Or, could be having my own private jet affords me the luxury of easy
interstate travel.

Did you get wealthy scarfing up other public assets, or was callsign
collecting just a hobby?

Mark has been a ham for years.

Alas, even RoundUp doesn't kill all the weeds you spray it on, so I suppose
we can't expect the code-test to keep out all the undesirables, huh?

Can the RF Commandos kill all the weeds, or are they as impotent as
RoundUp?

wrote:

No, it would cite the items which were poor amateur practice, like
scarfing up a lot of callsigns...

There is no restriction in Part 97 or any other federal regulation which
limits the number of callsigns an individual can be assigned.

Please play again soon.


Did you get wealthy scarfing up other public assets, or was
callsign collecting just a hobby?

No, I'm a shipping mogul with an ocean-going trawler.


Can the RF Commandos kill all the weeds, or are they as impotent as
RoundUp?

We just do DFing. We leave the wetwork for others.

On Jan 23, 11:44 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
No, it would cite the items which were poor amateur practice, like
scarfing up a lot of callsigns...


There is no restriction in Part 97 or any other federal regulation which
limits the number of callsigns an individual can be assigned.

It's not in the Gospel according to St Hiram, either, but Riley became
your penpal for a reason. Can you tell us what that reason is?

Please play again soon.

Hey, I'm not the one with the penpal from the FCC.

Did you get wealthy scarfing up other public assets, or was
callsign collecting just a hobby?

No, I'm a shipping mogul with an ocean-going trawler.

Sure you are.

Can the RF Commandos kill all the weeds, or are they as impotent as

RoundUp? We just do DFing.

Dump Hucking?

We leave the wetwork for others.

So the RF Commandos are not a brain trust?