| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 19th 07, 01:59 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. |
|
#3
January 19th 07, 02:10 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote: wrote: Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. Robesin is a code-tested amateur extra. Those title-holders can do anything they want anywhere...according to them. Ahem...look at the list of "moderators" and the Titles they hold. QED. LA The new group will be like "Home, home on the range..." "Where never is heard a dissenting word..." |
|
#4
January 19th 07, 03:41 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time. Much more fun to debate license classes. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#5
January 19th 07, 04:28 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who post objectionable material. Funny I more or less selinced him if I had had your help it could have been done easier and more effctively I'm not going to waste my time. Hmm I am member of what you term an iferioir can do something you can't? Much more fun to debate license classes. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#6
January 19th 07, 12:01 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: will be deciding what to do with it... http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786 How will they do that? They will use the proposed method. What did you think? Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply proposing to create a moderated version. They are? People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups. They will? However, much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the moderation process on the other group. It won't? By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers. Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide what to do with it? They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and those who wish to do so will continue to post. Dee, N8UZE I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to continue to post. It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap. Dee, N8UZE I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a dissenting opinion. Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio groups the last few days have really been annoying. Dee, N8UZE Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no one seems to mind that. Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time. Robesin interprets that as "approval." Much more fun to debate license classes. Dee, N8UZE |
|
#7
January 19th 07, 06:43 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
People who aren't on RRAP
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| People ask me if RRAP had always been full of hams that act like retards. | General | |||
| People ask me if RRAP had always been full of hams that act like retards. | Policy | |||
| Two Kinds of People on RRAP | Policy | |||
| Hey Twist!!!! | CB | |||
| Cherry Hill horse racetrack- Mad Cow Disease Link found | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
