On Mar 3, 5:25�am, Leo wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0800, "

wrote:
From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am

On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
* QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.
snip
* How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo
* Tesla got? *AM, FM, or TV?

Several thousand hours, at least......all of it right here on RRAP *

Heh heh heh heh. Well, think of it this way: He isn't
causing ANY RFI or EMI by broadcasting on the
Internet... :-)

Is anyone up there knowledgeable about the Aussie
OUTbacker antenna line? I'm curious and there has been
some mention of them on the Antennex.com website.

73, LA

On 3 Mar 2007 15:24:14 -0800, "
wrote:

On Mar 3, 5:25?am, Leo wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007 19:54:30 -0800, "

wrote:
From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am

On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.
snip
How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo
Tesla got?
M, FM, or TV?

Several thousand hours, at least......all of it right here on RRAP

Heh heh heh heh. Well, think of it this way: He isn't
causing ANY RFI or EMI by broadcasting on the
Internet... :-)

...resulting in many,many kW hours left available for better uses
(i.e. curling irons, electric toilets and such)


Is anyone up there knowledgeable about the Aussie
OUTbacker antenna line? I'm curious and there has been
some mention of them on the Antennex.com website.

I've not heard of the OUTbacker until you mentioned it. A quick check
of the local ham radio stores (www.radioworld.ca and
www.durhamradio.com) showed no listing for this manufacturer, so there
probably aren't a lot of them installed up here.

Sorry, can't add to the knowledge base on this one - I'll ask around,
though!


73, LA

73, Leo

On Mar 2, 9:54�pm, "
wrote:
From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am
On Feb 28, 3:22?pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
* QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

*7* years, Steve. January 19, 2000. ;-)

* *Oh, my, Jimmie Noserve has made that a "holiday" event?

Nope.

We just keep it out there to remind everyone what a lying dweeb
you are, Lennie.

Or inept...But does it really matter?

* Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

Well, maybe. And maybe not. Time will tell.

* *So will William, an arrow, and an apple...

* Most liars like him usually are.

If he does what he said he'd do back then,
he wouldn't be a liar or a no-show, right?

Point taken and rightly so. Far be it for Lennie to actually DO
what he says he's going to do.

* *Something beyond 1930s state of the art, I hope.

* *How many KiloWatt rigs has Jimmie Noserve ever
* *tuned?

More than you, I bet....Mr Rear Area Radio Mechanic.

You're not really going to re-hash those lies about passing all
that traffic are you, Lennie? You got busted and humiliated then, it
will happen again. Why suffer. Just let it lay.

* *Has Jimmie Noserve ever tuned up anything beyond
* *the 23 cm amateur band frequency? *Anything below
* *550 KHz?

* *Has Sister Nun of the Above ever sat in the right
* *seat and knuckle-spanked a pilot talking on a
* *civil airways radio? *On a private sailboat?
* *On land during a heavy rainstorm? *On land in
* *the desert?

Why?

You haven't.

You're not a pilot, let alone a CFI, so if you're "knuckle-
spank(ing)" any pilot you're commiting a federal felony by battering
the pilot-in-command of a federally licensed aircraft in flight.

You're not qualified to "instruct" ANY person on proper
communications techniques.

* *How much broadcasting experience has Miccolo
* *Tesla got? *AM, FM, or TV?

I'm willing to bet tthat whatever it is, it's more than you...By
a loooooooooong stretch.

What rig should he buy for CASH?

* *How about an Icom IC-7800? *Yaesu FT-2000D?
* *IC-756PROIII? *FT-DX9000? *Kenwood TS-2000?
* *Yaesu FT DX 9000MP?

How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?!

All of those radios require a federal license to operate other
than to just turn on an listen to or admire the blinking lights.

You don't have a federal license that allows you to use any of
them in the intended manner.

(BTW: Please don't waste our time with tales of your
"professional" licensure...Your GROL is useless for Amateur
applications as it does not grant station privileges or authorize a
callsign)

What antenna?

* *How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic?

Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie.

* *On a U S Tower HDX-5106MDPL?

* *A Bencher Inc. "Skyhawk 3X10"? *A Butternut HF9V?

Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness.

CC&Rs?

* *Gasp! *I have to get one of those?!? *I don't
* *have any! *HORRORS!

No...You don't.

But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that
Log periodic on your block.

Operating procedures?

* *ABSOLUTELY! *By-the-Book Letter-Perfect as it was
* *in the 1930s so shall it be today!!!

* *Commit just ONE slight infraction and I would be
* *EXCOMMUNICATED!!! *Stripped of all licenses and
* *radios by Riley H. himself!!!

You have to HAVE a license to be stripped of, Lennie.

And if you're using "1930's" procedures, you'll sound like an
idiot on 21st century Amateur Radio...Which is pretty much what the
rst of us (except Morkie, and Morkie's an idiot) expect from you.

Vanity call?

* **VANITY* CALL?!?!? *Oh, my...

* *Can't use "N2EY" or "K4YZ" or "K8MN"...those VANITY
* *calls are TAKEN!!!

Here's one you can use right now on that Part 15 station you were
bragging about a couple of years back:

1PTZ2MNI

* *Have to go out to a furniture store to get the RIGHT
* *VANITY!

Think about it.

* *Wow! *So MUCH to think about! *Do you possibly think
* *ANYONE could approach your Expertise and Brillian Mind
* *about AMATEURISM in radio?!? *Nobody can, ya know...you
* *keep laying it onto us so much...

A TYPO! LENNIE'S MAD! ONLY MAD MEN NEEDING ANGER MANAGEMENT MAKE
TYPOS!....(Or so sayeth Lennie some hundreds of times over...)

Eight Days...No Lennie...No surprises there..................

Steve, K4YZ

On Mar 3, 10:20�am, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 2, 9:54?pm, "
wrote:
From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

*7* years, Steve. January 19, 2000. ;-)

Oh, my, Jimmie Noserve has made that a "holiday" event?

* * Nope.

* * We just keep it out there to remind everyone what a lying dweeb
you are, Lennie.

Steve,

Who is "we"?

I was simply reminding you that it has been more than
*7* years since Len wrote that he was "going for Extra right
out of the box." He also wrote a few months back that
he could pass the Extra with or without a Morse Code test,
but he never made good on that boast.

Also, what is the point of calling someone names like
"lying dweeb" and "Lennie"? All it does is bring you
down to their level of childish behavior.

* * Or inept...But does it really matter?

Len has since written that his "Extra right out of the box"
statement was merely a "throwaway comment" and was
"taken out of context".

Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

Well, maybe. And maybe not. Time will tell.

So will William, an arrow, and an apple...

Most liars like him usually are.

If he does what he said he'd do back then,
he wouldn't be a liar or a no-show, right?

* * *Point taken and rightly so.

Well, there you have it. Why call someone a liar
if they can prove you wrong by their own actions?

*Far be it for Lennie to actually DO
what he says he's going to do.

Maybe. Anyone with sense knows that.

Something beyond 1930s state of the art, I hope.

Well, let's see......

In the 1930s, radio amateurs were using Morse Code,
AM voice, and SSB voice modes, plus some forms
of radio control of model aircraft. They were using MF,
HF, and VHF. All of that still goes on today.

What rig should he buy for CASH?

How about an Icom IC-7800? ?Yaesu FT-2000D?
IC-756PROIII? ?FT-DX9000? ?Kenwood TS-2000?
Yaesu FT DX 9000MP?

* * *How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?!

That's "none of the above", Steve.

* * *All of those radios require a federal license to operate other
than to just turn on an listen to or admire the blinking lights.

* * *You don't have a federal license that allows you to use any of
them in the intended manner.

* * (BTW: *Please don't waste our time with tales of your
"professional" licensure...Your GROL is useless for Amateur
applications as it does not grant station privileges or authorize a
callsign)

What antenna?

How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic?

* * Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie.

Actually, Steve, you don't know that.

One of the most common TV antennas is a log
periodic. With some modification, one could
be used for VHF/UHF amateur radio communication.

Not that I'm recommending it, but it *could* be done.

On a U S Tower HDX-5106MDPL?

A Bencher Inc. "Skyhawk 3X10"? A Butternut HF9V?

* * *Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness.

What's with the namecalling, Steve?

The products named could possibly be used. Recall too
that Len has referred to an alleged "northern house"
which is not the Lanark Street address. Perhaps the
"northern house" has more land around it.

CC&Rs?

Gasp! I have to get one of those?!? I don't
have any! ?HORRORS!

* * No...You don't.

* * But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that
Log periodic on your block.

All depends what sort of LP is meant.

btw, "CC&R" means "Codes, Covenants and Restrictions".
It's a pretty safe bet that there are detailed building codes
for Len's Lanark Street property, and that putting up a
tower requires a building permit at the very least. There may
also be maximum height regulations, etc.

There's also the fact that the antenna must not extend over adjacent
properties without permission of the owners.

Operating procedures?

ABSOLUTELY! By-the-Book Letter-Perfect as it was
in the 1930s so shall it be today!!!

Commit just ONE slight infraction and I would be
EXCOMMUNICATED!!! Stripped of all licenses and
radios by Riley H. himself!!!

**You have to HAVE a license to be stripped of, Lennie.

* *And if you're using "1930's" procedures, you'll sound like an
idiot on 21st century Amateur Radio...

What is this fascination with the "1930s", anyway?

If something works well, why change it?

I am told that in the 1930s, people answered the telephone
"Hello", same as today. Hams in those days called CQ,
gave their own callsigns last when calling, used Q signals,
RST, etc. - same as today. The common "QWERTY"
keyboard arrangement of 2007 was in common use in the
1930s on mechanical typewriters and teleprinters.

So in many ways, we are all still using "1930s"
procedures today. Nothing wrong with that, either.

Vanity call?

*VANITY* CALL?!?!? Oh, my...

Can't use "N2EY" or "K4YZ" or "K8MN"...those VANITY
calls are TAKEN!!!

Actually, N2EY and K8MN are not vanity callsigns. K4YZ
and WK3C are vanity callsigns.

If someone looks up a callsign on qrz.com, then requests
'detailed information', the FCC database codes are
displayed. The codes tell things like which radio service
the call is assigned to, type of station (club, individual, etc.)
and whether the call is a vanity call or not.

N2EY is not a vanity call. Neither is K8MN. Both were
sequentially issued decades ago.

Think about it.

* * *Eight Days...No Lennie...No surprises there..................

Is that the best way to greet a possible newcomer, Steve?

---

It's clear that the rules change has resulted in a lot of
applications, which increases the processing time.

It's way too early to see long-term trends based on
short-term results. That's just common sense.

For example, back on Feb 22, 2007, the last day before
the rules changes, there were 654,680 current unexpired
FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals.
Of those, 324,326 (49.54%) were Technician or
Tech Plus class licenses (293,508 and 30,818, respectively).

As of March 3, 2007, yesterday, there were 654,551
current unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses
held by individuals. That's a *decrease* of 129.

Of those 654,551 hams on March 3,
323,026 (49.35%) were Technician or
Tech Plus class licenses (292,598 and 30,428, respectively).

Does that mean the changes have failed to cause growth?
I don't think so - I think it's simply too early to tell.

Whether Len is part of that or not really isn't clear
yet. Perhaps he is, perhaps he's not, and
simply trying to get a reaction.

Len has already admitted that he puts intentional
errors in his postings in order to get a response.

Do you really *want* Len to get an amateur license,
Steve?

73 de Jim, N2EY

From: on 4 Mar 2007 11:08:30 -0800

Wowie...PREDICTABLE RESPONSES! I post to Miccolis and Robeson
replies, the Miccolis "replies" to Robeson (but is really
replying to me...). Damn, but that IS predictable! :-)

On Mar 2, 9:54?pm, " wrote:
From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:


I was simply reminding you that it has been more than
*7* years since Len wrote that he was "going for Extra right
out of the box." He also wrote a few months back that
he could pass the Extra with or without a Morse Code test,
but he never made good on that boast.

Now, now, Sister, curb your impatience, put down the
ruler and start watching the callsign sites from
about Wednesday onwards. That will match what Ted
said about "10 to 15 days." :-)


Also, what is the point of calling someone names like
"lying dweeb" and "Lennie"? All it does is bring you
down to their level of childish behavior.

Tsk, tsk, "childish behavior." :-) Go thee over to
RRAM and look at your own comment on "peak the grid
and dip the plate" is INCORRECT. Wow, I make the first
response to Coslo on his question and you have to jump
in with flailing knuckle-spanking ruler! "Incorrect"
"Incorrect." Gotta love it...:-)

Len has since written that his "Extra right out of the box"
statement was merely a "throwaway comment" and was
"taken out of context".

It was just that AT THE TIME. Tsk, you had to
MANUFACTURE a Big Brouhaha over it much later!
Gotta love it! :-)


Well, there you have it. Why call someone a liar
if they can prove you wrong by their own actions?

No problem to you, Jimmie. You just manufacture
something out of whole cloth... :-)



What rig should he buy for CASH?

How about an Icom IC-7800? ?Yaesu FT-2000D?
IC-756PROIII? ?FT-DX9000? ?Kenwood TS-2000?
Yaesu FT DX 9000MP?

? ? ?How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?!

That's "none of the above", Steve.

Riiiiight...she can't be bought...unless there's
some morse code involved...



How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic?

? ? Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie.

Actually, Steve, you don't know that.

Wow! Something that Miccolis and I agree on! :-)

One of the most common TV antennas is a log
periodic. With some modification, one could
be used for VHF/UHF amateur radio communication.

Nobody in my neighborhood has any "common TV
antennas" unless you count satellite dishes.
We have excellent cable TV service, both analog
and digital (we have digital).

House across the street and down one has no less
than 4 sat dishes. :-)

Not that I'm recommending it, but it *could* be done.

Why do all that futzing around when one can be
purchased? Save all the futzing time for radio
operating... :-)


? ? ?Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness.

What's with the namecalling, Steve?

Standard Robesin Operating Procedure. :-)

The products named could possibly be used. Recall too
that Len has referred to an alleged "northern house"
which is not the Lanark Street address. Perhaps the
"northern house" has more land around it.

Northern house is in Kitsap County, WA. Ten acres
full of virgin evergreens 60 to 100 feet high. Will
undergo some thinning out soon. Lots of good raw
timber there that will fetch some nice dollars. :-)

Mr. Real Estate Expert, just go to the Kitsap
County and look it up. It is public knowledge in
their records. Real Estate taxes are all paid on
that one, too. :-)

Donut that just frost 'em though? :-)


CC&Rs?

Gasp! I have to get one of those?!? I don't
have any! ?HORRORS!

? ? No...You don't.

? ? But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that
Log periodic on your block.

All depends what sort of LP is meant.

"Military style" rotatable...requires an 80 foot diameter
circle clearance for full rotation. Just like the one
at NADC Warminster, PA, over 30 years ago. No sweat. But,
I don't like to live IN an antenna farm. Did that for half
a year (2 square miles of antenna farm).

To WHERE would I rotate that rotatable antenna? YOU are
the self-defined "expert" on the area. Don't you KNOW?

btw, "CC&R" means "Codes, Covenants and Restrictions".
It's a pretty safe bet that there are detailed building codes
for Len's Lanark Street property, and that putting up a
tower requires a building permit at the very least. There may
also be maximum height regulations, etc.

Oh, my, Mr. Real Estate EXPERT doesn't KNOW EXACTLY?

Tsk, tsk, from all the blathering you did on Zoning
a few months ago, I thought you would KNOW!

Here's a clue, Shylock: I live a mile from the edge of
BUR; civilians know it as "Bob Hope Airport." The FAA
must be advised if something is erected 200 feet above
normal terrain. However, "normal terrain" goes higher
than 300 feet above my back yard. :-)


There's also the fact that the antenna must not extend over adjacent
properties without permission of the owners.

Not a problem in the back. Got a nice clearance space
there for anything rotating in an 80-foot circle. You
want to check that out? No problem. Just go to Mapquest
and enter my USPS address. Get the address from some old
Ham Radio bylines...hasn't changed for 44 years. :-)

You can even see a somewhat dated aerial photo of the
location, see the relative sizes of everything. Or,
you could go to the L.A. County records, even get a
topographic map of the area. Won't cost you much and
you would be oh so EXACT on data! Don't you KNOW all
those things? You said you "were familiar with the area"
or words to that effect.

Now IF you really were "familiar," then you would KNOW
that I have NO, repeat NO cee-cees here at the southern
house. None in the northern one. Go LOOK for that
non-existant CC&R, Shylock, prove me wrong...


It's clear that the rules change has resulted in a lot of
applications, which increases the processing time.

Tsk, so far, the vast majority have been just class
changes, renewals, and vanity call applications.

It's way too early to see long-term trends based on
short-term results. That's just common sense.

Define "way too early." The trend is already
present. Even Dee Flint noticed it first-hand
in her local VE group.

Have YOU done anything to help newcomers to US amateur
radio? Get them into the exam locations in the droves
that all you morsemen PROMISED were going to happen?


Does that mean the changes have failed to cause growth?
I don't think so - I think it's simply too early to tell.

When would be a good time for you to "tell?" 2027?
2017?

You already stated that overall licensee numbers
were dropping. Do you have very short attention
span disorder?

In the 11 days of 22 Feb to 4 Mar, the US total
individual licensees dropped 369. That's over 3
a day average. That's been happening steadily
for over three years.

Whether Len is part of that or not really isn't clear
yet. Perhaps he is, perhaps he's not, and
simply trying to get a reaction.

Jay-Suss! I've left enough clues for even an
Inspector Clousseau to figure out! :-)

Do you really *want* Len to get an amateur license,
Steve?

He doesn't *want* anything but suffering and death
for ANYONE disagreeing with him. No one need be
an Inspector "Clue-so" to see that!

So, Sister, do you think you've got the cojonnes
to reply to me directly or are you going to go through
the SAME procedure as usual? :-)

See you on the 13 cm bands...

LA

On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

Most liars like him usually are.

sigh.

Steve, K4YZ

when you going to apoligize to af6ay?

On Mar 8, 8:03�am, "an_old_friend" wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:

* * *QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

* * *Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

* * *Most liars like him usually are.

* * *sigh.

Steve, K4YZ

when you going to apoligize to af6ay?

Mark, it will be a cold day in hell when he apologizes
to anyone. Keep on wearing summer clothing. :-)

73, AF6AY

On Mar 8, 12:34�pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 8, 8:03?am, "nobodys_old_friend" wrote:

On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:

? ? ?QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

? ? ?Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

? ? ?Most liars like him usually are.

? ? ?sigh.

Steve, K4YZ

when you going to apoligize to af6ay?

* *Mark, it will be a cold day in hell when he apologizes
* *to anyone. *Keep on wearing summer clothing.

Oooops...Wrong again!

Especially since it's been done here before...

So...Lennie...When do we actually get to hear you on the air?

Steve, K4YZ

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

Most liars like him usually are.

sigh.

Steve, K4YZ

when you going to apoligize to af6ay?

When are you going to apologize to K4YZ?

On Mar 8, 4:44�pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:
"nobodys_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com... On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote:

* * *QRZ is laden with all sorts of brand new licensees, yet none of
them are the "right out of the box 6 years ago" Leonard H Anderson.

* * *Like I said...he's gonna be a no-show.

* * *Most liars like him usually are.

* * *sigh.

Steve, K4YZ

when you going to apoligize to af6ay?

When are you going to apologize to K4YZ?

THAT won't EVER happen, Anymouse.

Morkie's been caught in lie after lie and has yet to apologize
for any of it..he ADMITS he's a liar, but won't apologize for any of
the dozens he's been caught in.

Steve, K4YZ