Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on 4 Mar 2007 11:08:30 -0800
Wowie...PREDICTABLE RESPONSES! I post to Miccolis and Robeson replies, the Miccolis "replies" to Robeson (but is really replying to me...). Damn, but that IS predictable! :-) On Mar 2, 9:54?pm, " wrote: From: on Fri, Mar 2 2007 3:05 am On Feb 28, 3:22 pm, "K4YZ" wrote: I was simply reminding you that it has been more than *7* years since Len wrote that he was "going for Extra right out of the box." He also wrote a few months back that he could pass the Extra with or without a Morse Code test, but he never made good on that boast. Now, now, Sister, curb your impatience, put down the ruler and start watching the callsign sites from about Wednesday onwards. That will match what Ted said about "10 to 15 days." :-) Also, what is the point of calling someone names like "lying dweeb" and "Lennie"? All it does is bring you down to their level of childish behavior. Tsk, tsk, "childish behavior." :-) Go thee over to RRAM and look at your own comment on "peak the grid and dip the plate" is INCORRECT. Wow, I make the first response to Coslo on his question and you have to jump in with flailing knuckle-spanking ruler! "Incorrect" "Incorrect." Gotta love it...:-) Len has since written that his "Extra right out of the box" statement was merely a "throwaway comment" and was "taken out of context". It was just that AT THE TIME. Tsk, you had to MANUFACTURE a Big Brouhaha over it much later! Gotta love it! :-) Well, there you have it. Why call someone a liar if they can prove you wrong by their own actions? No problem to you, Jimmie. You just manufacture something out of whole cloth... :-) What rig should he buy for CASH? How about an Icom IC-7800? ?Yaesu FT-2000D? IC-756PROIII? ?FT-DX9000? ?Kenwood TS-2000? Yaesu FT DX 9000MP? ? ? ?How about "Nun Of The Above"...?!?! That's "none of the above", Steve. Riiiiight...she can't be bought...unless there's some morse code involved... How about a tower-mounted rotatable Log-Periodic? ? ? Not allowed in your neighborhood, Lennie. Actually, Steve, you don't know that. Wow! Something that Miccolis and I agree on! :-) One of the most common TV antennas is a log periodic. With some modification, one could be used for VHF/UHF amateur radio communication. Nobody in my neighborhood has any "common TV antennas" unless you count satellite dishes. We have excellent cable TV service, both analog and digital (we have digital). House across the street and down one has no less than 4 sat dishes. :-) Not that I'm recommending it, but it *could* be done. Why do all that futzing around when one can be purchased? Save all the futzing time for radio operating... :-) ? ? ?Just numbers copied out of a catalog to you, Your Putziness. What's with the namecalling, Steve? Standard Robesin Operating Procedure. :-) The products named could possibly be used. Recall too that Len has referred to an alleged "northern house" which is not the Lanark Street address. Perhaps the "northern house" has more land around it. Northern house is in Kitsap County, WA. Ten acres full of virgin evergreens 60 to 100 feet high. Will undergo some thinning out soon. Lots of good raw timber there that will fetch some nice dollars. :-) Mr. Real Estate Expert, just go to the Kitsap County and look it up. It is public knowledge in their records. Real Estate taxes are all paid on that one, too. :-) Donut that just frost 'em though? :-) CC&Rs? Gasp! I have to get one of those?!? I don't have any! ?HORRORS! ? ? No...You don't. ? ? But you have a zoning code which still won't let you erect that Log periodic on your block. All depends what sort of LP is meant. "Military style" rotatable...requires an 80 foot diameter circle clearance for full rotation. Just like the one at NADC Warminster, PA, over 30 years ago. No sweat. But, I don't like to live IN an antenna farm. Did that for half a year (2 square miles of antenna farm). To WHERE would I rotate that rotatable antenna? YOU are the self-defined "expert" on the area. Don't you KNOW? btw, "CC&R" means "Codes, Covenants and Restrictions". It's a pretty safe bet that there are detailed building codes for Len's Lanark Street property, and that putting up a tower requires a building permit at the very least. There may also be maximum height regulations, etc. Oh, my, Mr. Real Estate EXPERT doesn't KNOW EXACTLY? Tsk, tsk, from all the blathering you did on Zoning a few months ago, I thought you would KNOW! Here's a clue, Shylock: I live a mile from the edge of BUR; civilians know it as "Bob Hope Airport." The FAA must be advised if something is erected 200 feet above normal terrain. However, "normal terrain" goes higher than 300 feet above my back yard. :-) There's also the fact that the antenna must not extend over adjacent properties without permission of the owners. Not a problem in the back. Got a nice clearance space there for anything rotating in an 80-foot circle. You want to check that out? No problem. Just go to Mapquest and enter my USPS address. Get the address from some old Ham Radio bylines...hasn't changed for 44 years. :-) You can even see a somewhat dated aerial photo of the location, see the relative sizes of everything. Or, you could go to the L.A. County records, even get a topographic map of the area. Won't cost you much and you would be oh so EXACT on data! Don't you KNOW all those things? You said you "were familiar with the area" or words to that effect. Now IF you really were "familiar," then you would KNOW that I have NO, repeat NO cee-cees here at the southern house. None in the northern one. Go LOOK for that non-existant CC&R, Shylock, prove me wrong... It's clear that the rules change has resulted in a lot of applications, which increases the processing time. Tsk, so far, the vast majority have been just class changes, renewals, and vanity call applications. It's way too early to see long-term trends based on short-term results. That's just common sense. Define "way too early." The trend is already present. Even Dee Flint noticed it first-hand in her local VE group. Have YOU done anything to help newcomers to US amateur radio? Get them into the exam locations in the droves that all you morsemen PROMISED were going to happen? Does that mean the changes have failed to cause growth? I don't think so - I think it's simply too early to tell. When would be a good time for you to "tell?" 2027? 2017? You already stated that overall licensee numbers were dropping. Do you have very short attention span disorder? In the 11 days of 22 Feb to 4 Mar, the US total individual licensees dropped 369. That's over 3 a day average. That's been happening steadily for over three years. Whether Len is part of that or not really isn't clear yet. Perhaps he is, perhaps he's not, and simply trying to get a reaction. Jay-Suss! I've left enough clues for even an Inspector Clousseau to figure out! :-) Do you really *want* Len to get an amateur license, Steve? He doesn't *want* anything but suffering and death for ANYONE disagreeing with him. No one need be an Inspector "Clue-so" to see that! So, Sister, do you think you've got the cojonnes to reply to me directly or are you going to go through the SAME procedure as usual? :-) See you on the 13 cm bands... LA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
A Study of Amateur Radio Demographics | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |