What Revolution?
On Apr 16, 8:42 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Apr 15, 10:15 am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Apr 14, 2:16 pm, wrote: Then there's the inclusion of obviously intentional mistakes in Len's posts, as a way of getting attention from those who correct those mistakes. That one presents a bit of a moral dilemma, because to leave the mistakes uncorrected may cause some to be deceived by them. The mistake is used to bait those who have an unreasonable need to correct others. Miccolis, Heil and Robesin fit that profile. It seems that your response includes intentional mistakes, used purely for baiting others. It seems that your response fits the "unreasonable need to correct others" profile. I made no effort to correct you. Dave K8MN- I made no effort to bait you, yet here you are. |
What Revolution?
On Apr 15, 10:15 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Apr 14, 2:16 pm, wrote: Then there's the inclusion of obviously intentional mistakes in Len's posts, as a way of getting attention from those who correct those mistakes. That one presents a bit of a moral dilemma, because to leave the mistakes uncorrected may cause some to be deceived by them. The mistake is used to bait those who have an unreasonable need to correct others. Miccolis, Heil and Robesin fit that profile. It seems that your response includes intentional mistakes, used purely for baiting others. Dave K8MN I see no mistakes. |
What Revolution?
|
What Revolution?
|
What Revolution?
On Apr 17, 1:11 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Apr 16, 8:42 am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Apr 15, 10:15 am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Apr 14, 2:16 pm, wrote: Then there's the inclusion of obviously intentional mistakes in Len's posts, as a way of getting attention from those who correct those mistakes. That one presents a bit of a moral dilemma, because to leave the mistakes uncorrected may cause some to be deceived by them. The mistake is used to bait those who have an unreasonable need to correct others. Miccolis, Heil and Robesin fit that profile. It seems that your response includes intentional mistakes, used purely for baiting others. It seems that your response fits the "unreasonable need to correct others" profile. I made no effort to correct you. My statement above is true. I made no effort to bait you, yet here you are. The first portion of your statement is false. The first step in the process of correction is recognizing or manufacturing an error. I'm here when I want to be and I'm not here when I choose not to be here. Dave K8MN- Ditto. |
What Revolution?
On Apr 17, 1:13 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Apr 15, 10:15 am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Apr 14, 2:16 pm, wrote: Then there's the inclusion of obviously intentional mistakes in Len's posts, as a way of getting attention from those who correct those mistakes. That one presents a bit of a moral dilemma, because to leave the mistakes uncorrected may cause some to be deceived by them. The mistake is used to bait those who have an unreasonable need to correct others. Miccolis, Heil and Robesin fit that profile. It seems that your response includes intentional mistakes, used purely for baiting others. Dave K8MN I see no mistakes. Well then. I've identified one of your difficulties. Dave K8MN You have? |
What Revolution?
|
What Revolution?
|
What Revolution?
John Smith I wrote:
wrote: You are in his killfile. Live with it. if only that were so http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com Mark: You'd be wise to killfile dave, don't you think he has given you enough chit. Krist, the whole ng is filled with his trash ... The fact is, nobody has abused this newsgroup with more strangled cries for attention than Mark Morgan. You needn't be embarrassed by your apostrophe debacle. You can always choose a new pseudonym. I don't think anyone is using "John Doe" right now. Dave K8MN |
What Revolution?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com