wrote:

nope it is becuase I did not yeaild to the blackmail of Steve J
robeson 9 years agao

Blackmail is a very serious crime. One has to wonder why the Houghton County
Prosecuting Attorney didn't haul Steve in 8.5 years ago...

"KH6HZ" wrote in message
...
wrote:

nope it is becuase I did not yeaild to the blackmail of Steve J
robeson 9 years agao

Blackmail is a very serious crime. One has to wonder why the Houghton
County
Prosecuting Attorney didn't haul Steve in 8.5 years ago...

You know how Mark is. He makes up "laws" as he sees fit depending on the
time and curcumstances.
In fact, one could well make the claim that Mark is unjustly and wrongfully
accusing others of "staking", harrassment, and a myriad of other allegations
that suit his fancy at the moment.

Mark is the little boy crying WOLF!

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:55:36 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:


more name calling Mike
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

No name calling. Mere observation of facts.
If one were given to name-calling, one could refer to you as a functional
retard, or a ****head, or any number of descriptors. But far be it from me
to do so.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:45:02 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:

wrote:

I was pleased with my local VE team's performance (all four,
not just three) and congratulated them after the testing was
over. [I observed them while they were observing me and the
applicant group]

They were ARRL VEs, weren't they?

Perhaps this was the same VE team that tested the 4 1/2 year old?
mike they were a ARRL VEC team as told by the FCC no perhaps about
that

Odd that a 4.5 year old can pass a test that you are incapable of.

Oh, wait! That is a conspiracy fomented by a few VE's that allegedly dislike
you.
You are not well liked in many arenas. QRZ and NimBusters to name a couple.

Are you getting the drift?

On Mar 10, 1:02 pm, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 10, 11:07 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 10, 12:15 am, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message
egroups.com...
On Mar 9, 9:53 pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:
[snip]
So less than two dozen ( 24) amateurs aren't enough to make up a VE
team? That IS news to me.
If the numbers presented earlier were correct, it would not matter if they
were all VEs. They could not have tested Mark since only one of them held a
license class higher than General. To conduct a General license exam, they
must hold either an Advanced or Extra license.
Dee is a cheerleader for Morse Code and the ARRL. That's known as
"bias."
My support of Morse code has no bearing on the number of VEs in Mark's area
who are eligible to administer the General exam.
Dee, N8UZE
Fair enough.
I was just disgusted by your legitimizing Robesin's sexual inuendo and
accusations that Mark's wife is a man.
That is all.
I sometimes get the feeling that you're about as peculiarly wired as Mark.
Sometimes? Don't hold back. What do you think of me the rest of the
time?

I wasn't writing about the rest of the time. I expressed my view
concisely.

Nothing was said about your inability to express a view concisely.
And I asked for you to cover all of the bases.

Since you've asked: Much of the time, you write like an
insecure fellow with a chip on his shoulder.

See? I knew you could do it. All it took was a little gentle
coaxing.

There have been occasions
though, when you've posted something in a fairly rational manner.

To ascribe some sinister motivation to Dee Flint is at best, absurd.

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

Dave K8MN- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Mar 10, 7:57 pm, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote:

You sick, twisted freak.

Ahh, a Glenn Beck fan.

On Mar 11, 3:45�am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:

AF6AY wrote:
* *I was pleased with my local VE team's performance (all four,
* *not just three) and congratulated them after the testing was
* *over. *[I observed them while they were observing me and the
* *applicant group]

They were ARRL VEs, weren't they?

Perhaps this was the same VE team that tested the 4 1/2 year old?

I doubt it.

Those 4-1/2 year olds were tested in Indiana. AF6AY was tested in
California. AF6AY does
not know and has never met anyone involved
in the VE testing of those children back in 1998.
He simply *ASSUMES* that there is no way
they could have passed the tests honestly.

His proposed "cure" for that "problem" was to
propose that no one under the age of 14 years
be allowed to earn a US amateur radio license.

That way,
they could likewise "mentor" old geezers during their examination, so said
bitter old geezers could get their 'license'?

All the VEs and volunteer examiners I have
known and met have been very careful to follow
both the spirit and letter of the rules. That doesn't
mean all VEs are perfect. Just that I don't have any
first hand objective evidence of any VEs "mentoring"
during a test. Neither does AF6AY have any first
hand objective evidence of such behavior by those
VEs in Indiana.

Of course there have been documented cases of
VEs not following the rules to the letter. FCC has
conducted investigations and retests. AFAIK, no
such investigation has ever been done on the
VEs discussed by AF6AY.

As for "bitter old geezers", there's never been any
sort of age requirement, maximum or minimum, for
any class of US amateur radio license. Nor should
there be, IMHO, even though in recent years the
worst violators of FCC rules for the Amateur Radio
service have been in a certain age group. Ex-KG6IRO, who lived less
than 25 miles from AF6AY
and was recently sentenced to seven years in prison
for radio-related crimes, is well past retirement age.
So is the unlicensed person in Florida (Flippo?) who
is still behind bars IIRC.

--

Then there's the issue of the analogy between
ARS rules changes and real estate zoning
changes, but that's another thread....

73 de Jim, N2EY

On Mar 11, 5:01 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
nope it is becuase I did not yeaild to the blackmail of Steve J
robeson 9 years agao

Blackmail is a very serious crime. One has to wonder why the Houghton County
Prosecuting Attorney didn't haul Steve in 8.5 years ago...

Robesin has an attorney on retainer - gratis.

Then he started guessing who the attorney's new bride was sleeping
with, right here on RRAP.

I wonder if Robesin will be well represented by such an attorney who
offers to work for free then suffers Robesin's insults?

With Robesin, it's always about the wives...

On Mar 11, 5:55 am, "Morkie" anon@anon wrote:

Mark is the little boy crying WOLF!

Robesin is the little creep crying WIFE!

On Mar 10, 8:32 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

On Mar 10, 11:29 am, "Dean M" wrote:

How's that report on me going. Should be at least 500 words double
spaced

The report was completed back when I said I made it.

I so doubt that. You're all bluster like your trainer

I so don't care. But here's an interesting little factoid so that
you'll sleep better at night:

You asked for my State's Attorney General and I gave his info to you,
but I had merely reported you to your ISP.

You jump to conclusions then harass me when the AG office doesn't
check on you. What an idiot.