Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim"
writes: We'll see. I think it's going to depend upon the fervor for which the amateur radio community approaches the FCC and all that bit of "stuff." There will be proposals all over the place. The smart money will wait for treaty ratification. Tradition is a strong thing, and I think tradition may have a lot to do with how timely the cancellation of a CW requirement will be. Look at how much effect 'tradition' had on the restructuring. Zip, nil, nada. The restructuring R&O made it clear, IMHO, that the one and only reason FCC kept Element 1 was the treaty requirement. It would be illogical for FCC to keep Element 1 now that there's no more treaty requirement. Even though we're talking govt. regulations, I can't imagine FCC being that illogical and reversing itself. -- So the big question is: What OTHER changes should be made? 73 de Jim, N2EY WWHD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |