"Bert Craig" wrote in message v.net...
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message
m...
"Bert Craig" wrote in message
.net...
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message
om...
(WA8ULX) wrote in message
...
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back, as soon as all the CBers upgrade to
there
Free
Handout Ham Licenses?


We didn't "lose" 11M, we just had use CB reddios radios

It's "reddios" on 11M and radios on 12M and elsewhere. "When in Rome
do as the Romans do."

Sorry, Brian. Within the circles that I operate, It's "radios." (On both 11m
and the ham bands. YMMV.)

It sure does!!

FYI, folks here are QSX when they're monitoring
the frequency. I rarely hear the annoying "I'm QRT and on the side" anymore,
thank goodness. :-)

I was involved in trying to use CB for it's original intended purpose
in the mid-'70s in 23 channel days. Specifically for comms for a
municipal Townwatch group of 135 citizens 95% of whom had no interest
at all in hobby radio and just wanted reasonably decent local
neighborhood mobile comms. The disgusted group would have fallen apart
if I hadn't moved the operation up onto a VHF business freq to get
away from the CB crud. Cost a bundle but they're still on that freq.

Every once in a blue moon when I've had absolutely nothing better to
do with my life I've gotten on 27Mhz and looked for intelligent life.
On the rare occasions when I've actually found some it lasts maybe
five minutes at most before the bozos blow it off the freq.

YMMV . . !

w3rv

Brian Kelly wrote:


Every once in a blue moon when I've had absolutely nothing better to
do with my life I've gotten on 27Mhz and looked for intelligent life.
On the rare occasions when I've actually found some it lasts maybe
five minutes at most before the bozos blow it off the freq.

YMMV . . !

w3rv

So as to the subject "Do Hams get 11 Meters Back", I ask, "why
in the world would hams want 11 meters back?" Eleven meters is
the perfect example of what happens when rules are thrown out
the window, total chaos. The cber's have managed to make it the
sewer pit of the radio spectrum and the sad part is they can't
even keep it in their own territory, they have to spew their
garbage to other frequencies as well.
The fact that hams in general follow the rules, and expect other
operators to do the same is what keeps many cber's from getting
a license. I say, "good riddance, we don't need those types in
ham radio."

"Brian Kelly" wrote in message
om...
"Bert Craig" wrote in message
v.net...
FYI, folks here are QSX when they're monitoring
the frequency. I rarely hear the annoying "I'm QRT and on the side"
anymore,
thank goodness. :-)

I was involved in trying to use CB for it's original intended purpose
in the mid-'70s in 23 channel days. Specifically for comms for a
municipal Townwatch group of 135 citizens 95% of whom had no interest
at all in hobby radio and just wanted reasonably decent local
neighborhood mobile comms.

You just can't legislate propagation. Even if all the users complied with
the 155.3 mi. limit, the QRM from legal comms in distant places makes local
work difficult, if not impossible. I've experienced a S7 noise level from
distant comms personally and the guy in Germany came in clearer than someone
across town. When the band's open, 12 Watts will work the world.

The disgusted group would have fallen apart
if I hadn't moved the operation up onto a VHF business freq to get
away from the CB crud. Cost a bundle but they're still on that freq.

Good "heads-up" move.

Every once in a blue moon when I've had absolutely nothing better to
do with my life I've gotten on 27Mhz and looked for intelligent life.
On the rare occasions when I've actually found some it lasts maybe
five minutes at most before the bozos blow it off the freq.

Sorry to hear that, Brian. Do you operate AM or SSB? I've had good luck on
channels 36 through 40 using SSB.

YMMV . . !

It sure does.

w3rv

--
73 de Bert
WA2SI