Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still am curious why the "middle" code test speed was set at
thirteen...... Why not 12 or 14???? -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would have come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy |