Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message .net... "N2EY" wrote: The removal of the Morse Code test from the Technician class license has not resulted in a technical revolution in amateur radio from newly-licensed "technically qualified" amateurs. (snip) I didn't know the Technician license was supposed to lead to a technical revolution in anything, Jim. Instead, I thought they were just supposed to participate in the same activities most other Amateur Radio operators are participating in. Why the unique expectation for Technician license holders alone? Those who pushed for the Tech no code license loudly and repeatedly claimed that it would lead to a major influx of technically bright hams that would lead to significant technical advances in ham radio since it was supposedly code keeping them out. Well that influx of technical types didn't happen. Unfortunately, the Technician licensees following that change are saddled with an expectation that they themselves did not create. They shoulder the burden of expectations created by those who would not have to fulfill them. Whether or not one believes in code testing, it highlights some of the inherent flaws in the argument that code keeps technical types out of ham radio. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I wonder how many of the 'enlightned' know what the Technician license was ORIGINALLY intended for? I'll help you out....it wasn't an 'entry level' license. Come on all you old timers. Straighten out the enlightned out there. Dan/W4NTI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors |