Actually, that was a fact. Character is absent in this individual -
that's why he behaves the way he does. He respects no one other than
himself - so - ergo - no character.

The other was humour. As I have already explained. And also fact!

Leo

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:14:02 -0500, "Clint" rattlehead at computron
dot net wrote:


"Leo" wrote in message
.. .
Well, then you have nothing to worry about, OM - no character to
assassinate.


and you DID it again. That's the SECOND personal attack you've made,
while at the SAME time saying the NCTA crowd is the one who does it.
Along with THIS statement YOU made..

"For the most part, it's an intelligent and good natured
animal - but you do have to watch out for the pricks.... "

referring to some people in this newsgroup on this same date (september
25).

You really SHOULD consider stopping and cutting your losses; the more
you speak, the more you harm your own case. I must admit, you do a much
better job at defeating yourself than 1,000 well trained debaters could.

Clint
KB5ZHT

"Leo" wrote in message
...
Actually, that was a fact. Character is absent in this individual -
that's why he behaves the way he does. He respects no one other than
himself - so - ergo - no character.

The other was humour. As I have already explained. And also fact!

Leo


....and the opposite of a "fact" is a "falsehood", which you commited a few
threads up by trying to pass that off as a quote of Len's!!!! Which is it
hypocrit boy? Yea, you "explained" this time but you ALSO said
it wasn't you and that I needed an english language lesson because you
were quoting Len. I have already cut and paste the post that BUSTS you
on that.

Clint
KB5ZHT