![]() |
Mike those posts just illustrate the extent of the problem the posters
have long had - for them code testing trumps everything else. You just dont get it. Its not just the code. The next hurdle will be easy to do away with. Dont believe it, just ask TIT, let her explain the magic of a 1/4 Wave Dipole. Let her tell you how most Hams dont have a clue on this Magical Antenna, and remember it was TIT, and her No-Code bunch who discovered it. |
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: And I think the three classes of license are reasonable and appropriate. Tech becomes the "entry" license, general is "mid-grade," and extra is "top." I don't see anything wrong with that ... What do you think would be a good division knowledge wise between the classes? The tech and general are not too bad now, knowledge to privileges. I lean a bit toward having the Extra require a bit more knowledge, or perhaps experience. I know a few no-experience Extra's and it just seems (to me) that some "time in grade" might make the license more meaningful. - Mike KB3EIA - Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The extra used to mean something. Now it means squat. Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now. Dan/W4NTI All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the 20wpm code was dropped. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I was refering to when I upgraded, back in the 70s. I had several chances to change to a 1X2. As I said, glad I didn't now. I'll just keep what I got, and let folks wonder what I have. Cause there sure ain't no reason to brag about it. Dan/W4NTI |
"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The extra used to mean something. Now it means squat. Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now. Dan/W4NTI All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the 20wpm code was dropped. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE The real observation here is to note a complaint about extra class hams not knowing what the length of a 1/2 wave dipole was on a given frequency; has nothing to do with sending and recieving morse code skill. Kinda showed your colors there. Clint Let me clear up the fog for you Clint. My point is the Extra ain't worth a damn any more. Dan/W4NTI |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message et... Alun Palmer wrote: "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in : Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The extra used to mean something. Now it means squat. Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now. Dan/W4NTI All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the 20wpm code was dropped. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE The real observation here is to note a complaint about extra class hams not knowing what the length of a 1/2 wave dipole was on a given frequency; has nothing to do with sending and recieving morse code skill. Kinda showed your colors there. Clint It was a dead giveaway. Anyone who thinks that 20wpm code operating skill means you know all about dipoles has a serious problem that no amount of discussion will ever change. The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements, ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread. That an extra might have no idea about the length of a half wave dipole at 40 meters - or more importantly, precisely no idea on how to calculate it - indicates a more serious problem to me. - Mike KB3EIA - My point exactly. But lets not confuse the dead heads out there with the reality of the situation. Dan/W4NTI |
"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements, ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread. They may or may not; if the FCC decides that no "no further change in the license structure is required at this time" then of course that will be the final word on *that* matter, and we'll accept it and go on since they are the ones that have the final say. I just couldn't help but notice how certain ones in here I think have such an overpowering agenda regarding the CW part of the testing that it tends to take them over and govern, or at least seriously influence, everything they have to remark about in ham radio. I'm a general class operator; I realize by definition that means I had to show knowledge in certain areas to prove I deserved recieving the next higher license class than tech-plus; however, I did not demonstrate enough skill and knowledge to warrant recieving the advanced class license. Therefore, advanced class operators *should* know more than I do, or at least as much. That brings us to the sad truth that if an *extra* class license operator doesn't know how to calculate the length of a walf wave dipole on 40m (or whatever frequency), that is a serious issue. I say that because calculating the length of an antenna, especially a halfwave dipole of ALL things, is and always WILL be so basic to ham radio that it should be on page one of chapter one of every study guide ever printed. Such matters is why I put such a strong emphasis on putting more priority on written testing than that of the skills of translating a CW transmission. Sad thing is, most the time I get on 75 meters and begin discussing ham radio tech stuff, there is usually one heckler that harangues you about it and makes light of the fact that you were talking about ham radio stuff and not what the weather was like on a day 58 years ago while an old man sat on a porch and peeled potatoes in the hot summer sun... true story. I actually was on the airwaves a few weeks ago discussing the pros and cons how how to set up a new 75 meter inverted V I was going to make at home... and as soon as I finished the conversation with the other ham and he went off the air, a couple of hams got in there and began talking to one another BASHING me for doing so... can you imagine??? Clint Sure can Clint. And you just made my point. Dan/W4NTI |
"WA8ULX" wrote in message ... Do you guys dream about morse code tests? Look lid you still dont get it, I am well aware the CW test is gone, my complaint still is the Give away Written. Don't confuse him Bruce....he thinks he is on a roll. Dan/W4NTI |
Clint, Clint, Clint. She was making a point of discussing the time. Not
the code, per se. She said all the 1X2s were issued BEFORE the code was dropped. Do you have a comprehension problem too? Dan/W4NTI "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... Exactly. That was my point; make a post about back up batteries for black-out ham radio operations, and you'll get them making CW test remarks about it. Make a post about feedline pro's and con's, and they'll devolve it back to morse code testing. Talk about what is the best background noise reducing handheld radio for use on the toilet when you have diahrrea.. and yep, it's all about morse code testing again. No matter what, follow a thread long enough and they'll find a way to use the most twisted path of logic to blame NCI and the reduction & removal of morse code testing. Was it, in fact, to blame for the shuttle disaster? I digress. Clint "Alun Palmer" wrote in message ... Mike Coslo wrote in et: Alun Palmer wrote: "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in : Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The extra used to mean something. Now it means squat. Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now. Dan/W4NTI All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the 20wpm code was dropped. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE The real observation here is to note a complaint about extra class hams not knowing what the length of a 1/2 wave dipole was on a given frequency; has nothing to do with sending and recieving morse code skill. Kinda showed your colors there. Clint It was a dead giveaway. Anyone who thinks that 20wpm code operating skill means you know all about dipoles has a serious problem that no amount of discussion will ever change. The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements, ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread. That an extra might have no idea about the length of a half wave dipole at 40 meters - or more importantly, precisely no idea on how to calculate it - indicates a more serious problem to me. - Mike KB3EIA - But one that has nothing to do with 20wpm, which I didn't introduce into the discussion |
"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. ah, and there we have it. the agenda. -- Reasons why it sucks to be a liberal.... file overrun error -- You really have a problem don't you Clint? Or are you just stupid? I used that statement as a point in time. Thats all. And you talk about the pro coders having a problem. Shhhhhhhhhsssshhh.. Dan/W4NTI |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message et... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: And I think the three classes of license are reasonable and appropriate. Tech becomes the "entry" license, general is "mid-grade," and extra is "top." I don't see anything wrong with that ... What do you think would be a good division knowledge wise between the classes? The tech and general are not too bad now, knowledge to privileges. I lean a bit toward having the Extra require a bit more knowledge, or perhaps experience. I know a few no-experience Extra's and it just seems (to me) that some "time in grade" might make the license more meaningful. - Mike KB3EIA - Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The extra used to mean something. Now it means squat. To my logic, the top level should be exactly that - the top level. The expert in the field. This should entail more than the test requirements. The Extra should be able to be depended on to give intelligent and accurate answers to normal situations that crop up: "Whoa there fella, you're in the CW portion of the band operating voice. Here let me show you where the band edge is." "Ahh, the reason you can't work Europe is you have your dipole oriented the wrong way." "Here, let me help." The general class op can of course be inexperienced Sometimes they can do things in an incorrect or inefficient manner. But that's okay as long as they eventually get it right. But if the highest class doesn't really mean anything, perhaps there should only two classes Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now. I'm still trying to decide what to do. I do a fair bit of contesting, and KB3EIA is quite a mouthfull at those times. It's not too bad CW wise (tho I haven't done CW contesting - maybe if I ever get good enough) - Mike KB3EIA - Go ahead and drop it. But a W4 ain't too ruff. Although the "I" gets dropped in QSB at times. I do alright contesting. What contests do you do? I don't remember you. Course I've only done them for 30 years or so. Dan/W4NTI |
As I said, glad I didn't now. I'll just keep what I got, and let folks
wonder what I have. Cause there sure ain't no reason to brag about it. Dan/W4NTI Thats why these No-Coders run out and grab a 1x2 or 1x3.They think this will make people think they have been around awhile and know something. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com