Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Why should the FCC simply grandfather the Tech (no code) to Tech plus (code and Novice test) ?? The Tech (no code) has no HF test questions. (as I understand it). Thus there is no reason a Tech (no code) would, or should be qualified to operate HF. As things are now, a no code tech can take the 5WPM element 1 test, and gain access to HF as a novice. Besides, what's *that* different about HF vs VHF (aside from propagation)? One viewpoint would say that all a ham really needs to know a rules and regs, electrical and RF safety issues, some knowledge to judge if a rig is in band and on a desired legal frequency and is not emitting excessive harmonics, and how to handle RFI problems. This because the FCC allows all hams to build, repair and adjust our transmitters. Even novices. I haven't heard of any FCC enforcement actions because of deficient equipment lately. Today it's mostly bozos acting up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |