"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

Well, call it what you want, Kim. You told me that
you're an informed consumer that routinely researches
the products you buy.

No, Dwight. I did *not* say that at all. In fact, here is
what I said: (snip)


Kim, just two or three messages ago, I said:
"You and I both knew you couldn't do it, Kim.

The information it not that easily available and it

would take considerable effort for consumers to
research the products they purchase each day,

week, or year. In spite of your claims otherwise,

you don't do it." (snip)



You responded directly to that with:
"Dwight, are you calling me a liar? Yes, I have

done it, and yes it is not all that difficult to do."




Then, get your own damned sites, Dwight. Point is,

become smart about what you're buying. (snip)


Kim, when it comes to mainstream consumer information, I'm as well
educated as most anyone else, most certainly including you. But we were
talking about the economy - more specifically, the impact of consumer
purchasing trends on the economy ("shoppers not going to the store to ponder
global economic implications," "economic awareness," and so on) and how
difficult it is to find substantial economics-related information (which
companies are moving factories overseas, foreign business investments, and
so on). We were (I was) not talking about environmental issues (the Exxon
Valdez oil spill you mentioned) or other such topics. Now, just like
everyone else, you're certainly free to bring up those other topics, but
please don't apply something I've said about economics to those topics.


Gads, you're an ass Dwight...


Only when speaking with one, Kim.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

Well, call it what you want, Kim. You told me that
you're an informed consumer that routinely researches
the products you buy.

No, Dwight. I did *not* say that at all. In fact, here is
what I said: (snip)


Kim, just two or three messages ago, I said:
"You and I both knew you couldn't do it, Kim.

The information it not that easily available and it

would take considerable effort for consumers to
research the products they purchase each day,

week, or year. In spite of your claims otherwise,

you don't do it." (snip)



You responded directly to that with:
"Dwight, are you calling me a liar? Yes, I have

done it, and yes it is not all that difficult to do."



It's a far stretch from the above, to stating that *I* said I am an informed
consumer that routinely researches the products I buy. I stated nothing of
the sort. Have it your way, though, Dwight. You're desperate to be
right...so be it.



Then, get your own damned sites, Dwight. Point is,

become smart about what you're buying. (snip)


Kim, when it comes to mainstream consumer information, I'm as well
educated as most anyone else, most certainly including you. But we were
talking about the economy - more specifically, the impact of consumer
purchasing trends on the economy ("shoppers not going to the store to
ponder
global economic implications," "economic awareness," and so on) and how
difficult it is to find substantial economics-related information (which
companies are moving factories overseas, foreign business investments, and
so on). We were (I was) not talking about environmental issues (the Exxon
Valdez oil spill you mentioned) or other such topics. Now, just like
everyone else, you're certainly free to bring up those other topics, but
please don't apply something I've said about economics to those topics.


Gads, you're an ass Dwight...


Only when speaking with one, Kim.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



I don't think Jim's an ass, Dwight...

Kim W5TIT