Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote FCC or somebody would have to keep a database of everyone who had held one and let it expire without upgrading, to insure that someone wouldn't retest and get a second one. No more than FCC or somebody kept a similar database to prevent ex-licensees from glomming onto a Novice permit back in the 1950's. A false application today is just as unlikely as a false application 50 years ago, and I suspect the penalties are similar. And why bother --- after 10 years of experience, the standard exam would be a laugher. 73, CU in NAQP, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |