Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 02:44:02 GMT, Dave Heil wrote:
You claim to know what is best for amateur radio. Your comments above do not address morse testing; they address morse USE. What is it to you, a fellow with no stake at all in amateur radio, if radio amateurs continue to use morse? Not only that, at a recent meeting, the ITU-T (Telecommunications Group, which defines coding) put forth a definition for a _new_ character in International Morse - the "at" sign (@). It's .__._. (_AC_). So much for "Morse is dead". -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane (Who is in favor of deleting the Morse test but continuing the use of Morse) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |