Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee D. Flint wrote:
"N2EY" wrote in message ... However, I think that one of the problems today is that the entry-level license is too VHF/UHF/voice/applicane operator-centric. The entry level license should offer a wide selection of bands and modes, rather than what we have now where newcomers get all of VHF/UHF but no HF. 73 de Jim, N2EY Newcomers with any gumption can have some HF if they choose to pass the code. Indeed! Tech study guide and test does include some very basic questions on HF propagation, procedures, rules, etc. Unfortunately too many instructors ignore the HF side of things and don't bother to give much encouragement to go after the code so then the students end up on VHF/UHF only. My instructor, many moons ago, really emphasized going for the "complete" Tech license (Novice written + Tech written + code). I'm glad he did. Although there isn't a tech plus any more, if I were to teach a class, I would leave no doubt that I expected the students to go on beyond the Technician license, and would probably even have a little time devoted to trying out Morse code to see what would happen. But even for the new licenses, if Morse code goes by the wayside, I'd include a little bit of the General information to try to whet the student's appetites for one of the advanced licenses. Question for the group: Is learning more a bad thing or something? - mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Excellent ARRL proposal | Policy | |||
Excellent ARRL proposal | General |