| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: There is also a lot of bad science out there involving immunizations. For example, there are still folks trying to sell the idea that immunizations are somehow a cause of autism, even though repeated scientific studies have shown no causality. There *is* a sort of correlation in that the first definitive signs of autism are usually observed about the age of many common immunizations. The very success of immunizations has been a big part of the controversy sround their continued use. "After all, no one gets these diseases anymore, so why should we immunize for them?" Agreed. And of course the reason such diseases are almost gone is - universal immunization. Stupid logic, but there are some pretty stupid people out there. If they think immunizations are bad, they should see how bad not immunization is. Yep. This is one reason why the study of history - real history - is so important. -- It's also important to distinguish between "medical malpractice" and "medical mistakes". 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|