Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in
ink.net: "Alun" wrote in message ... This is the latest update I could find on Google:- WA2SI: September 13, 2003 KF6TPT: September 29, 2003 KC8EPO: December 31, 2003 K2UNK: January 1, 2004 K2ASP: March 15, 2004 AA2QA: April 1, 2004 N2EY: April 15, 2004 N3KIP: May 1, 2004 KC8PMX: July 1, 2004 WA2ISE: August 1, 2004 K3LT: September 15, 2004 WK3C: December 30, 2004 N8UZE: July 1, 2005 KB3EIA: July 5, 2007 K5TIT: June 1, 2008 Currently, if the code test was dropped before June 15, I would be the winner, but that isn't likely as we don't even have an NPRM. The most recent NPRM took 2 years to work it's way through. If we go by that, it makes Dee the most likely winner. By then the US could be one of the last countries with a code test, as per Len's humourous piece that he posted the other day. Alun, N3KIP Your right Alun. I will make a prediction. The FCC will retain CW, but for the Extra class only. After all someone has to be able to talk to those Russians and her ex slave countries. Dan/W4NTI You wish. I predict Element 1 will go. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in ink.net: "Alun" wrote in message ... This is the latest update I could find on Google:- WA2SI: September 13, 2003 KF6TPT: September 29, 2003 KC8EPO: December 31, 2003 K2UNK: January 1, 2004 K2ASP: March 15, 2004 AA2QA: April 1, 2004 N2EY: April 15, 2004 N3KIP: May 1, 2004 KC8PMX: July 1, 2004 WA2ISE: August 1, 2004 K3LT: September 15, 2004 WK3C: December 30, 2004 N8UZE: July 1, 2005 KB3EIA: July 5, 2007 K5TIT: June 1, 2008 Currently, if the code test was dropped before June 15, I would be the winner, but that isn't likely as we don't even have an NPRM. The most recent NPRM took 2 years to work it's way through. If we go by that, it makes Dee the most likely winner. By then the US could be one of the last countries with a code test, as per Len's humourous piece that he posted the other day. Alun, N3KIP Your right Alun. I will make a prediction. The FCC will retain CW, but for the Extra class only. After all someone has to be able to talk to those Russians and her ex slave countries. Dan/W4NTI You wish. I predict Element 1 will go. Most people of limited drive and ambition will take that position. Glad to see I have you placed in the right hole. Dan/W4NTI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You wish. I predict Element 1 will go. Most people of limited drive and ambition will take that position. Glad to see I have you placed in the right hole. Dan/W4NTI The way the FCC has talked about code lately, I doubt that they'd keep it for extra only vs just dumping it entirely. "Reduction of burden on the VE's giving the tests" and all that. Keeping it for extra means that VEs have to keep and maintain code test tapes. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... You wish. I predict Element 1 will go. Most people of limited drive and ambition will take that position. Glad to see I have you placed in the right hole. Dan/W4NTI The way the FCC has talked about code lately, I doubt that they'd keep it for extra only vs just dumping it entirely. "Reduction of burden on the VE's giving the tests" and all that. Keeping it for extra means that VEs have to keep and maintain code test tapes. Gee, ya really think so? And so what? Since when did the gobernmunt give a hoot out of what the citizens want? Dan/W4NTI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in
link.net: "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... You wish. I predict Element 1 will go. Most people of limited drive and ambition will take that position. Glad to see I have you placed in the right hole. Dan/W4NTI The way the FCC has talked about code lately, I doubt that they'd keep it for extra only vs just dumping it entirely. "Reduction of burden on the VE's giving the tests" and all that. Keeping it for extra means that VEs have to keep and maintain code test tapes. Gee, ya really think so? And so what? Since when did the gobernmunt give a hoot out of what the citizens want? Dan/W4NTI They don't, but the FCC is heavily into the concept of reducing the regulatory burden by simplification of rules, a very Reaganesque idea. Which is simpler, keeping a requirement for some licences only or making it go away altogether? Abolishing Element 1 completely fits their philosophy, and the alternative doesn't. Of course, since the code tests are done by volunteers you could argue that no money will be saved. Firstly, that won't stop them, and secondly, VEs may be less likely to claim expenses if they don't have to buy code tapes, so some paltry amount of money may in fact be saved. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Of course, since the code tests are done by volunteers you could argue that no money will be saved. Firstly, that won't stop them, and secondly, VEs may be less likely to claim expenses if they don't have to buy code tapes, so some paltry amount of money may in fact be saved. Na Alun don't worry about those expenses for code tapes or programs or 33 RPM records etc. There have been many a VE out there who has taken his significant other out for a "night on the town" after a VE session. Why would some guys drive for a hundred miles to "take" a test when tests are locally offered ??? Dare I say shenanigans ....... ?????? 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Belle Vernon Pa. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "garigue" wrote There have been many a VE out there who has taken his significant other out for a "night on the town" after a VE session. I take K0CKB out for a "night on the town" anytime I damned well please, but it has nothing to do with funds from a VE session. If you can prove your accusation, then the FCC will be greatly interested in hearing from you. On the other hand, it's my guess that you're full of male-bovine-fecal-matter up to your eyeballs, and somebody ought to stomp a mudhole between them for your slander. With all kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"garigue" wrote in
news:u%uqc.75539$xw3.4174734@attbi_s04: Of course, since the code tests are done by volunteers you could argue that no money will be saved. Firstly, that won't stop them, and secondly, VEs may be less likely to claim expenses if they don't have to buy code tapes, so some paltry amount of money may in fact be saved. Na Alun don't worry about those expenses for code tapes or programs or 33 RPM records etc. There have been many a VE out there who has taken his significant other out for a "night on the town" after a VE session. Why would some guys drive for a hundred miles to "take" a test when tests are locally offered ??? Dare I say shenanigans ....... ?????? 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Belle Vernon Pa. You do realise that the max that can be claimed back is a percentage of the test fee? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
garigue wrote:
Of course, since the code tests are done by volunteers you could argue that no money will be saved. Firstly, that won't stop them, and secondly, VEs may be less likely to claim expenses if they don't have to buy code tapes, so some paltry amount of money may in fact be saved. Na Alun don't worry about those expenses for code tapes or programs or 33 RPM records etc. There have been many a VE out there who has taken his significant other out for a "night on the town" after a VE session. Why would some guys drive for a hundred miles to "take" a test when tests are locally offered ??? Zounds, Tom!!! I doubt that the proceeds from most tests would cover much of a night out on the town, once the VEC gets it's cut. Then you have the other VE's to split the booty with...... Heck, I doubt you could eat at Arby's by the end of the malfeasance. All endeavors have the occasional bad egg, but at every test I ever attended - there were 4 of them - the VE's seemed as honest as can be, plus some of them that I personally knew are in no doubt as to their honesty. And FWIW, I live in State College PA. I took my Technician test in Williamsport, over an hour away. I took my General test in Butler PA, a two hour + drive I took my Element 1 test in State College PA (flunked it at Butler) I took my Extra test at Lock Haven, around an hour drive. Basically the reason that I traveled to the tests was because that was where a test was taking place when I had the time to take the test. - Mike KB3EIA |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"garigue" wrote in message news:u%uqc.75539$xw3.4174734@attbi_s04...
There have been many a VE out there who has taken his significant other out for a "night on the town" after a VE session. As a reward for putting up with the demands of being a VE. Paperwork, lots of extra stuff about the house, spending a good part of the weekend at some hamfest or other giving tests to strangers for not much more than a couple of donuts...... Why would some guys drive for a hundred miles to "take" a test when tests are locally offered ??? Lots of reasons. Most of the VE sessions I know of are part of a hamfest, so two things get done. Timing of the tests is another - if someone is a "morning person", taking the test in the evening is setting oneself up for failure. "Local" tests that are scheduled at inconvenient times don't do the testee any good. Dare I say shenanigans ....... ?????? Got any proof? Not aspersions on the character of unnamed persons, but actual solid proof of wrongdoing? If so, tell Riley - FCC does care about such things. If not, why besmirch the efforts of thousands of honest volunteers? The VEs who do the grunt work of actually giving the tests didn't invent the system and they don't make the rules. In the 20 year history of the system, only a tiny handful out of thousands of VEs have been found guilty of any sort of wrongdoing in connection with their VE activities. Perhaps an apology to the vast majority of honest VEs is in order. Yes, I wish FCC would do all the testing, and that the tests were secret, etc., etc. But that's just not going to happen any time soon because it costs $$$. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |