Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "KØHB"
writes: http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html Some good ideas, some not-so-good ideas. Good ideas: - It's about bandwidth, not content. Right now, if you can fit a digital voice signal into a 200 Hz bandwidth, you can only use it on the 'phone-image subbands. But you can use a much wider PACTOR signal on the CW/data subbands - as long as the PACTOR signal isn't carrying digital voice. - Is Hellschreiber data or image? - Faster data modes have a place to play Bad ideas: - Robot pactors and such can go way down in the band - No CW-only subbands Just IMHO. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |