LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old August 14th 04, 06:02 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net, "KØHB"
writes:

http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html

Some good ideas, some not-so-good ideas.

Good ideas:

- It's about bandwidth, not content. Right now, if you can fit a digital voice
signal into a 200 Hz bandwidth, you can only use it on the 'phone-image
subbands. But you can use a much wider PACTOR signal on the CW/data subbands -
as long as the PACTOR signal isn't carrying digital voice.

- Is Hellschreiber data or image?

- Faster data modes have a place to play

Bad ideas:

- Robot pactors and such can go way down in the band

- No CW-only subbands

Just IMHO.

73 de Jim, N2EY

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 36 September 9th 04 09:30 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine General 8 September 8th 04 12:14 PM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine Dx 0 September 5th 04 08:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017