LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old September 1st 04, 04:30 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Avery Hightower" wrote


Amateurs should address comments to Industry Canada as directed in the
Notice. RAC recommends that Canadian amateurs endorse this proposal.

Amateurs with questions for RAC should direct them to their regional

RAC
Director.

The Notice is available at:

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf06456e.html


I'm not Canadian, nor do I play one on TV, but this is an interesting
proposal.

It proposes full access to HF without a Morse examination. I'm in
favor.

It proposes to enhance the technical qualifications of applicants. I'm
in favor.

It neatly avoids the "great giveaway" syndrome of the ARRL proposal.
I'm in favor.

Good job, RAC! ARRL, are you listening?

73, de Hans, K0HB








 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal Emmersom Bigguns Policy 0 September 6th 03 04:27 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017