Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Avery Hightower" wrote Amateurs should address comments to Industry Canada as directed in the Notice. RAC recommends that Canadian amateurs endorse this proposal. Amateurs with questions for RAC should direct them to their regional RAC Director. The Notice is available at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf06456e.html I'm not Canadian, nor do I play one on TV, but this is an interesting proposal. It proposes full access to HF without a Morse examination. I'm in favor. It proposes to enhance the technical qualifications of applicants. I'm in favor. It neatly avoids the "great giveaway" syndrome of the ARRL proposal. I'm in favor. Good job, RAC! ARRL, are you listening? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |