Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: Dave Heil Date: 9/2/2004 10:53 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil writes: Well, there you have it. You're no more involved in Canadian amateur radio than you are in U.S. amateur radio. Jahwohl, Herr Oberst. Nicht gehabben ein Kanada amatur license! Not quite correct, old Nazi-obsessed fellow. You haven't an amateur radio license anywhere on the planet. Well...there's yet another endeavor for which His Putziness obviously has no practical experience...German. click, click Your Nikon? More like his cane on the edge of the sidewalk. I've "not been involved in radio" before 1947, other than listening to it. Super, Len. I've been an SWL and medium wave listener too. 51 years ago I got assigned to a major HF communications station and was in that for three years. Got out of the Army and got into commercial radio and the electronics-aerospace industry and continued working in that until retirement. That's nice for you. I'm sure you're very proud. It has, however, nothing to do with amateur radio. I've had a commercial (professional) radio license for 48 years! Nor does this have anything to do with amateur radio. Of course that cannot possibly top your magnificent 41 years as an amateur, can it? Not in a newsgroup concerned with amateur radio or in amateur radio itself it can't. Perhaps ignoring the simple facts is what kept Lennie moving from "assignment" to "assignment"...Not being able to work on the details certainly kept him from being a central figure in anything important in Pennsylvania. By the way, since your Lordship doesn't understand it, I'm NOT itching to get that mighty Nobel-quality amateur license...I'm just trying to argue for the elimination of the morse code test for any radio operator license. Your statement simply makes your posts here all the more peculiar. You have no stake at all in amateur radio. I keep saying that but you refuse to believe it. Oh, I believe it. I just love hearing you reaffirm it. Either you are so damn dumb that you can't believe it...or you are so corrupt and can't counter any arguments for the morse code elimination that you INVENT other "causes" you claim I have. Did I invent your idea for a minimum age for amateur radio participation? Have I invented the personal attacks written by you in comments to the FCC? Which is it? I haven't recognized the validity of your premise. Or his "premise" that the ARRL is "dishonest"...Or that he'll ever get an "Extra out of the box", or that there's any "recreational" radio service...or that etc etc etc ad nauseum. Lennie's just left a wide swathe of "or that's...." left undone. "No matter what job, educational level, employer, or government/military service that anyone has, if said anyone opposes Heil's views, he/she will be the target of Heil's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, total lack of emoticons and social-interaction graces, acting in an arrogant, elitist manner...for years" :-) That's pretty stupid, Len. You've stolen the words of another, used quotations and inserted my name. That pretty well sums up your style. Hey Dave...Plagerism earned him "big bucks" from Ham Radio magazine...you know...that DEFUNCT periodical that he was such a bigwig at.... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |