| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
September 7th 04, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William) Date: 9/7/2004 8:33 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (Len Over 21) writes: Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that? Why do you specify only "Canadian radio amateurs"? What about Canadians who are not radio amateurs? I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily discarded by the amateur elite. There is no "amateur elite", unless, of course, you refer to folks like W1RFI, K1EA, etc etc. And NO opinons are "readily discarded", Brain...even yours. But antagaonistic, spiteful insults are. Your bunk buddy had to push a lot of buttons and hurl a lot of insults to get himself to where he is today...scorned and dismissed by anyone who has even the least amount of awareness of the factual circumstances of what the Amateur Radio service is, what it has accomplished in the past and where it's going in the future. You're not far behind, but I think folks view you more as the Organ Grinder's monkey...jumping when you hear your master's music play. Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
