| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
September 8th 04, 05:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
(Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (Len Over 21) writes: Any Canadian radio amateurs care to comment on that? Why do you specify only "Canadian radio amateurs"? What about Canadians who are not radio amateurs? I beleive that the same rules apply as in the USA. Non-amateur may have an opinion, but that opinion is uninformed and is readily discarded by the amateur elite. It looks as if you're confused again, "William". Len not only isn't part of the amateur elite, he isn't part of amateur radio in the U.S. or Canada at all. Yet he has been quick to demand a say in how U.S. amateur radio is regulated. Wouldn't he automatically be interested in how non-radio amateurs in Canada think about their regulatory changes? It looks like the old "William"/"Avery" double standard. Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
