About Us

September 23rd 04, 09:58 AM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP)
Date: 9/16/2004 4:58 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/16/2004 4:15 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

He's not "AUTHORIZED" to emit RF OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands

K4CAP: What "other country", Brian?

Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in.

What "other country", Brian?

Whatever other country that Len might happen to be in.

I've not said a single word about another country's "rules and regs of
amateurism".

You said, "OUTSIDE the U. S. Amateur Bands"

Yes, I did...

Those bands of radio frequencies as allocated by the United
States Federal Communications Commission.

Not outside the territorial limits of the United States.

Len gets to decide what other countries. Then you have to
provide the rules that deny him access.

You're in idiot mode again, Brian.

The context of the posts were directly related to your mentor's lack of
legal authorization to emit RF inside or outside of the US Amateur Radio bands.
(Certain FCC exceptions to authorized unlicensed operation not withstanding).

(Such as the Part 15 and Part 95 devices that I rubbed your nose in,
notwithstanding?)

You've not "rubbed my nose" in anything yet, Brian. Lennie's
right to emit 100 unlicensed milliwatts per part 15 or 4 watts per
Part 95 have never been in dispute. As a matter of fact, he's
insinutated that he intends to get on the Amateur Bands courtesy of
Part 15, but he's never done it.

Still waiting on YOU to provide some evidence of the "major roll"
played by those unlicensed devices in emergency comms, however.

Waiting for you to show us where you got the "another country's" business
from. I say you just shot your mouth off without thinking.

Sound's like brick is coming my way.

I'll make sure my wife is prepared for terrorism.

Save her the terror and sleep on the couch, Brian.

Steve, K4YZ

September 23rd 04, 12:02 AM

In article , Leo
writes:

On 22 Sep 2004 04:05:24 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:

In article , Leo

writes:

On 20 Sep 2004 22:22:59 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:
snip

No offense to Leo, but Canada has something called "snow" and
"rain" in the winter season. Not attractive to me. :-)

None taken - neither of these wonderful weather conditions are
particularly attractive to me either!

So, enough small talk about weather conditions. :-) Hear anything
worthwhile among the RAC folks and Industry Canada on this new
proposal?

Not yet - we're patiently waiting for the comments period to close,
and to see what happens next.....speculation is that the revisions
will be in place by year end.

Then again, it's in the hands of the Government......which means that
resolution by year end is guaranteed - only the specific year is in
question! 8*p

Roger that... :-)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test)	N2EY	Policy	6	December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC	Brian	Policy	3	October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal	Emmersom Bigguns	Policy	0	September 6th 03 04:27 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition	D. Stussy	Policy	13	August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement.	Keith	Policy	1	July 31st 03 03:46 AM

Menu

About Us