Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Avery Hightower" wrote in message link.net...
The Notice is available at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf06456e.html A very interesting proposal! What I find most interesting is that the proposal does *not* simply say "drop the code test and leave everything else alone" - as did the NCI proposal. Instead, it beefs up the written requirements by requiring a higher passing grade. It also proposes *adding* license classes.... (So much for simplifying the rules...) The analysis of the multiple-choice testing method and guessing is very interesting, showing how a limited knowledge of the material plus guessing can result in a passing grade. The 60% passing requirement seems low to me, but I suppose that our ~74% level would seem low to others. It's a refreshing change from the ARRL "Great Giveaway" proposal, and the much much worse NCVEC "Much Greater Giveaway" proposal. It will also be interesting to see how Canadians react to the proposal in their comments. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |