LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 04, 11:44 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Alun
writes:

(N2EY) wrote in
:

SNIP
- The concept of "subbands by license class" is intended to reward the
passing of more-advanced written tests.

73 de Jim, N2EY


I know what it's intended to do, but that doesn't mean it makes any sense.


It makes perfect sense.

Consider our neighbours to the North who have to get an Advanced to access
40 and the WARC bands. That makes more sense than subbands.


No, it doesn't. What that does is to crowd certain bands and empty others.

(That's only an
example - I'm not suggesting adopting the Canadian system wholesale).

So which bands would you give to entry-level?

73 de Jim, N2EY



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
1960's incentive licensing proposal N2EY Policy 3 January 24th 04 03:46 PM
My restructuring proposal Jason Hsu Policy 0 January 20th 04 06:24 PM
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing Arf! Arf! General 0 January 11th 04 09:09 PM
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing N2EY Policy 4 January 6th 04 02:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017