Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Nov 2004 04:53:05 GMT, Alun wrote:
You have to understand that the GMRS licence actually allows you to use a higher powered mobile transceiver, but only on two channels that you designate. Not any more. The GMRS license now permits operation on any GMRS channel, with restrictions only on specified channels above "Line A" which is roughly 150 miles south of the Canadian border. Stations above Line A which were licensed on those channels under the old "2-channel" rule can continue to operate on them. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Do I really need a license from the FCC
From: "Alex" Date: 11/26/2004 7:19 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Phil Kane" wrote in message . net... On 26 Nov 2004 04:53:05 GMT, Alun wrote: Not any more. The GMRS license now permits operation on any GMRS channel, with restrictions only on specified channels above "Line A" which is roughly 150 miles south of the Canadian border. Stations above Line A which were licensed on those channels under the old "2-channel" rule can continue to operate on them. Bull****. That is not true at all. Dear anonymous pateral parent fornicating scumbag, Wrong. It IS true. Steve, K4YZ |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:19:10 -0500, Alex wrote:
Not any more. The GMRS license now permits operation on any GMRS channel, with restrictions only on specified channels above "Line A" which is roughly 150 miles south of the Canadian border. Stations above Line A which were licensed on those channels under the old "2-channel" rule can continue to operate on them. Bull****. That is not true at all. I quote from a GMRS license (KAE8605) issued (renewed) in June 2002: Waivers/Conditions: Effective 2/16/99 the GMRS rules have been amended and you may operate on any of the primary or interstitial channels shown in section 95.29. Exception: Licensees who operate north of Line A and east of Line C may not operate on channels 462.650 MHz, 467.650 MHz, 462.700 MHz and 467 MHz unless your previous license authorized such operations. Read "Da Roolz" before running "Da Mout'..." -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote Dear anonymous pateral parent fornicating scumbag, Happy Thankgiving to you and your family too. With fondest kind wishes, de Hans, K0HB/4ID |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Dolemite) wrote in message . com...
I just bought two Uniden GMRS 2-way radios for $20. Then it is a GMRS/FRS integral-antenna hybrid - not a "real GMRS radio". I plan to use them while shopping in the mall and while out playing paintball. Do I really need to get an $80 5-year license from the FCC? If you don't use them on the 8 GMRS-only freqs, then no, you DON'T NEED A LICENSE! Use them on the 14 FRS freqs, when Tx power is limited to 500mW. What does the license protect against? Look - it was a GIMMICK instituted by the radio manufacturers to allow them to advertise their FRS radios as having more range (a few more milliwatts of Tx power), and more channels (8). There is NO VALUE ADDED in the gimmick, you get virtually no better range, and the extra 8 channels aren't worth the $80. Its not like I'm given my own frequency. Thanks for your help - Stewart For info on MURS - the BETTER license-free Public Radio Service: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MURS-OPEN |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Nov 2004 19:02:39 GMT, Alun wrote:
The stores, however, market GMRS handelds as FRS handhelds with more range, with the minor detail about needing a licence in the smallest possible print. That's how the MURS - non-licensed VHF low-power radios - came about. They were originally license-required Business Radio channels but E.F. Johnson and Motorola wholesaled their overrun but under-selling "el cheapo" handhelds out to Costco and Wal-Mart (remember the "color dot" and "jobcomm" radios ?) and the rest is history. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Do I really need a license from the FCC
From: "KØHB" Date: 11/26/2004 4:02 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: et "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote Dear anonymous paternal parent fornicating scumbag, Happy Thankgiving to you and your family too. Gee...sorry, Hans...If I'd known it was you, I wuddn't have called you "anonymous". Steve, K4YZ |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(stewart) wrote in message . com...
(Dolemite) wrote in message . com... Look - it was a GIMMICK instituted by the radio manufacturers to allow them to advertise their FRS radios as having more range (a few more milliwatts of Tx power), and more channels (8). There is NO VALUE ADDED in the gimmick, you get virtually no better range, and the extra 8 channels aren't worth the $80. Not true...as usual. Well...Let me ammend that to say they maybe of no use to YOU, Stewart. The "no better range" assertion is ludicrous. FRS radios are limited to 1/2 watt and a fixed internal antenna. A GMRS radio can use 50 times the power and external antennas that can provide even greater ERP. Furthermore, GMRS licensees have access to repeaters, albeit mostly on a pay-for-use basis. FRS and MURS are the gimmicks...Smoke-and-mirror advertising gets people to buy those radios, and when the disappointing performance sends them looking for something else, wa-la..we can sell them yet another radio! So...How's that nationwide MURS packet net coming? Steve, K4YZ |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would be surprised if Phil were to make an error on this kind of thing.
So, if I now have it right, a GMRS licencee can use all the FRS channels (aka GMRS interstitial channels) plus the additional GMRS channels between each pair of FRS channels, can use mobiles with more power than the GMRS handhelds, and can use GMRS repeaters if they belong to them as paid up members. IOW, they can do much more than a GMRS handheld provides. The stores, however, market GMRS handelds as FRS handhelds with more range, with the minor detail about needing a licence in the smallest possible print. That's exactly how they got me to buy these damn handsets. It allows 2 mile range on FRS channels and 6 miles range on GMRS. I guess I'm most confused about how the FCC intends on policing these airwaves. Do they record everychannel and maintain a massive database? Or must I be caught using it with the handset designated on the GMRS network. Honestly, I the gov't were to supply me with a manuel, or some form of education on getting more (proper) use out of the handset, I would not complain about getting the license. Again, I really want to thank everyone for their responses. Much appreciated. --alexis |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
Why the caste system? was: NCVEC files license restructuringdepends | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy |