"N2EY" wrote


OK, fine. Hans made a mistake.


No, Jim, I didn't make a mistake. I just overstated my case by 2%. I
said "over half" (51%) when I should have said "damned near half" (49%).

grin

Steve, on the other hand is completely mistaken when he claims "AH0XX"
is a call which would sequentially be assigned to an Extra licensee.

73, de Hans, K0HB

Subject: Care To Try Again, Steve?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 11/23/2004 6:43 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net



"N2EY" wrote


OK, fine. Hans made a mistake.


No, Jim, I didn't make a mistake. I just overstated my case by 2%. I
said "over half" (51%) when I should have said "damned near half" (49%).

grin

Steve, on the other hand is completely mistaken when he claims "AH0XX"
is a call which would sequentially be assigned to an Extra licensee

I did not say it was a call that would be sequentially assigned to an
Extra, Hans.

I said it was a call that an Extra could request. ("Glean" was the exact
word I used)

Steve, K4YZ

In article . net, "KØHB"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote


OK, fine. Hans made a mistake.


No, Jim, I didn't make a mistake. I just overstated my case by 2%. I
said "over half" (51%) when I should have said "damned near half" (49%).

grin

Ah yes. I made a mistake about your mistake, Hans :-)

51% to 49% is about the overstatement of Mr. Kerry vs. Mr. Bush, earlier this
month...

Steve, on the other hand is completely mistaken when he claims "AH0XX"
is a call which would sequentially be assigned to an Extra licensee.

whatever. I'd still think the system is broken.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Happy Thanksgiving to one and all.