Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Problem for boaters and APRS?
From: "KØHB" Date: 12/15/2004 10:23 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: t A friend sent me the link below. At first I thought it had to be an April Fool joke, but apparently The Shrub really IS that stupid! http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...ellites.html?e x=1104168601&ei=1&en=4e6b58c489759881 I'd ask you where you've been, Hans, but I know the question's rhetorical. Slick Willy specifically stated that he was authorizing the deactivation of accuracy inhibitors for non-military users based upon the pemise that American military commanders could re-activate it, or the President could order it's complete isolation from non-authorized users. That was in 1993 or 1994, I believe. WHY, Hans, would the United States NOT act to either "desensitize" the GPS net, or completely remove it from use for the criteria set forth in the article...?!?! Is it your contention that, given a set of "extreme criteria" (attack on the United States, overt acts of war, etc), that we should leave the net "open" regardless...??? What was stated in the article is NOTHING NEW! Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problem for boaters and APRS? | General | |||
The exciting world of APRS | Digital | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital | |||
APRS Linked Repeaters | Digital |