Again, I think the only way to solve this problem as I stated before is to
have the FCC clarify the rules only then will this problem be resolved.
untill then I will continue to inform Amateurs with my opinions about issues
in amateur radio.

Todd N9OGL

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Opinion: A belief or conclusion held with confinfidence but not
substantiated by proof (2) A judgement based on special KNOWLEDGE (3) A
judgement or estimation


Please note that in definition 2, you have put the emphasis on the wrong
word. The emphasis should be on JUDGEMENT not on knowledge. Note that
various and conflicting judgements (opinions) can be formed from the same
knowledge.

There is of course no rule that hams cannot be opinionated. There is of
course no rule that they cannot discuss their opinions in the course of
ordinary two way conversations. However the limited "broadcasting"
allowed
by part 97 specifies information bulletins. Opinions are not information
although of course they may be derived from information.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Hey Toad,

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a license
to be a broadcaster.

If you want to express your opinion on ham radio, about ham subjects, here
is a radical thought.......get on the air, engage someone in
conversation....and here it is....express your views. Far out eh?

Dan/W4NTI

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Again, I think the only way to solve this problem as I stated before is to
have the FCC clarify the rules only then will this problem be resolved.
untill then I will continue to inform Amateurs with my opinions about
issues
in amateur radio.

Todd N9OGL

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Opinion: A belief or conclusion held with confinfidence but not
substantiated by proof (2) A judgement based on special KNOWLEDGE (3) A
judgement or estimation


Please note that in definition 2, you have put the emphasis on the wrong
word. The emphasis should be on JUDGEMENT not on knowledge. Note that
various and conflicting judgements (opinions) can be formed from the same
knowledge.

There is of course no rule that hams cannot be opinionated. There is of
course no rule that they cannot discuss their opinions in the course of
ordinary two way conversations. However the limited "broadcasting"
allowed
by part 97 specifies information bulletins. Opinions are not information
although of course they may be derived from information.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Dan" wrote in message
nk.net...
Hey Toad,

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a license
to be a broadcaster.
Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Todd N9OGL


If you want to express your opinion on ham radio, about ham subjects,
here
is a radical thought.......get on the air, engage someone in
conversation....and here it is....express your views. Far out eh?

Dan/W4NTI

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Again, I think the only way to solve this problem as I stated before is
to
have the FCC clarify the rules only then will this problem be resolved.
untill then I will continue to inform Amateurs with my opinions about
issues
in amateur radio.

Todd N9OGL

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message
...
Opinion: A belief or conclusion held with confinfidence but not
substantiated by proof (2) A judgement based on special KNOWLEDGE (3)
A
judgement or estimation


Please note that in definition 2, you have put the emphasis on the
wrong
word. The emphasis should be on JUDGEMENT not on knowledge. Note that
various and conflicting judgements (opinions) can be formed from the
same
knowledge.

There is of course no rule that hams cannot be opinionated. There is
of
course no rule that they cannot discuss their opinions in the course of
ordinary two way conversations. However the limited "broadcasting"
allowed
by part 97 specifies information bulletins. Opinions are not
information
although of course they may be derived from information.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:57:28 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a license
to be a broadcaster.

Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver

After several times you didn't get the message, did you ??

so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Does your mother know that you use such language in public ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL




"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:57:28 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a
license
to be a broadcaster.

Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver

After several times you didn't get the message, did you ??

so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Does your mother know that you use such language in public ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Phil Kane wrote:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.


Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

And he wonders why the FCC didn't consider his application and waiver.

Phil Kane wrote:

Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

Todd can really turn a phrase. He still hasn't filled us in on what the
content-controlling FCC is preventing him from doing on the amateur
bands.


Dave K8MN

Todd Daugherty wrote:

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL

Toddyboy, you just continue to prove what a stupid juvenile little twit
you are. No go tell mommy to get you a glass of warm milk and do your
homework and after you pass through puberty and grow up some, come back
and try to talk with some intellegence.

WHY DON'T YOU AND YOUR FCC BOYFRIENDS KISS MY ASS!!

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Todd Daugherty wrote:

Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing
ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll
continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a
judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver.
But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider
it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your
old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and
whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure.
These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that
said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL

Toddyboy, you just continue to prove what a stupid juvenile little twit
you are. No go tell mommy to get you a glass of warm milk and do your
homework and after you pass through puberty and grow up some, come back
and try to talk with some intellegence.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----