Dave Heil, wearing his invisible royal robes as Archbishop of
the Church of St. Hiram, turned livid with apoplexy and blurted
out the following personal anguish on

wrote on Sun, Mar 6 2005 6:06 am:

Alun, you must understand that Robeson's name-calling is a long-
established habit of his, his own defense against not having a
valid
opinion/comeback on the subject in a thread. He goes for the
Personal Attack and then loses his objectivity in his own insults
while manufacturing "issues" that aren't there.

"Big badass Dave"

Tsk. NO ONE can tell big badass Dave what to do! :-)

"not wearing the SS uniform with twin lightning bolts but otherwise
acting like a downsized Gestapo veteran"

Tsk. The Waffen SS had to go...try to accept downsizing with
SOME semblance of grace and dignity. Return the uniform to
Central Casting...the rental fee is overdue.

"The Avenging Angle"

"concerning the Avenging Angle's further adventures in 'waste of
time'"

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Did big badass Dave have "seven hostile
actions, TOO?

Temper fry...

"Jimmy Who and cronies"

You know who... :-)

This sampling from the past couple of weeks of r.r.a.p. were all
written
by Leonard Anderson, the guy who "goes for the Personal Attack and
then
loses his objectivity in his own insults while manufacturing 'issues'
that aren't there".

Poor big badass Dave, another uber-sensitive PCTA extra who
pretends to "rule" in amateur radio. All fully of hissies today.

Can't take return fire like a seasoned combat veteran of
Vietnam in-country? Tsk, tsk, tsk.

It matters not when it was written nor does it matter that you didn't
follow it up. It matters that you wrote it.

Oh, my! "Once written, twice wry!" :-)

There are legal procedures for big badass Dave to take in
forcing the FCC to disregard what I wrote. I would suggest
a good attorney for consultation into filing charges of felony
mindslaughter and violation of the "new" Bill of Rights in
regards to amateur radio! Hurry! The statute of limitations
may run out soon! [statute in this case has clay feet,
doesn't run fast]

You've never disavowed it or asked that the FCC disregard it.

Why should I? :-)

The charge was made because it is absolutely true.

We ARE in agreement! ARRL news featured the story
of two adorable young children becoming, possibly, the
"youngest hams" at age 6. :-)


You tap danced then as you are tap dancing now.

Never professionally! :-) Not even in an amateur production!

I used to date a professional dancer a long time ago
(a "gypsy" in the TV biz). We never danced vertically.

I did get to put on some Haney Plates though, learned
a few time-steps. :-)

Nice of you to remind me of days long ago...


Now you wouldn't want to be presented with any facts that would give
lie
to the statement above, would you?

Irrelevant. PCTA extras in here don't recognize reality or
the real differences between right and wrong...anything
said against any PCTA extra is autormatically a "lie."

Sometimes it looks like PCTA extras bathe in Lie Soap.


I don't know of a single soul here who has ever made that claim or
anything near it.

No need for you to do that. You RULE amateur radio.
Those who RULE need not have any precedent for
their statements. [they are "precedent for life?"]


Don't worry about it too much, Leonard. You don't have an amateur
radio
license to deserve.

Tsk. I have a commercial radio license, had one for a
long time. I've had a long career IN radio-electronics
beginning in radio in early 1953...which is ten years
longer than big badass Dave and his first teen-age
amateure Novice thingy. :-)


I'll grant you that anytime you show up, it is deep.

...and cold, too! :-)


Let me ask you a couple of plain question to see if I can get some
straight answer from you, Len.

What, and take all the joy out of your compulsive-obsessive
behavior in here to attempt word-triumph over selected
writers? :-)

When is the last time that you ever admitted to any wrongdoing
in here?

According to newsgroup RULEZ (written by PCTA extras)
it was the very last posting I made...ANY posting. :-)

ALL postings, in fact. According to those RULEZ,
NO "unlicensed" (in the amateur radio service) poster has
"any business saying anything about amateur radio!" :-)

[of course, amateur radio is, by definition, NOT about
any business, is it? :-) ]

Further, the RULEZ say that ALL PCTA extras can make
any charges, ask questions which NCTAs MUST answer!
The "penalty" for not answering - as the PCTA extras
expect - is seve Many many posts and quotes from
Google DEMANDING answers sufficient to satisfy
those PCTA extra gods of radio. Woe to all when the
PCTA extras' wounds still fester and grow gangrenous!


I don't need the ARRL's input to tangle with the likes of you.

Tsk. ARRL is not involved in my "likes." :-)


Do you believe in your self-righteous attitudes, Len?

Ennumerate those "attitudes," big badass Dave.
Show your work. [which is going to be lines and
lines and lines and lines of Google quotes...:-) ]

I have this funny belief in FREEDOM, a wonderful
thing about freedom of expression and the freedom
of being able to communicate with my government
to make changes. [that must not be in big badass
Dave's world...]

That FREEDOM used to be guaranteed to all U.S.
citizens. However, NOT in U.S. amateur radio
where ONLY the PCTA extras want to RULE. Tsk.


Are you demented?

No. :-) I'm just a work professional in radio-
electronics who has had a hobby of all electronics
longer than I've been a professional. I'm terribly
fascinated by the outrage and hatred presented
by some self-righteous knowitalls who pretend to
RULE an activity - especially a hobby - just
because they think they RULE. :-)

How much of a fanatic would one have to be to spend
years in jousting with participants in an avocation in which you have
no
part?

Tsk. Look in the mirror, big badass Dave. If you
actually have a reflection, ask your image why
he persists in the compulsive-obsessive action
against only certain individuals, trying to attack
their person constantly. :-)