N9OGL wrote: (and again violates "nettiquete" by not citing his
attributions)

CORRECTIONS.....

Again, NO WHERE, in the FCC rules and regulations does it state an
information bulletin can not be opinionated.

An "information bulletin" colored by opinion ceases to be an
"information bulletin" and becomes editorial.

A information bulletin is
a vague word.

"AN" information bulletin" mya be a vague TERM, Todd.

However that will be up to the Engineer in your FCC District to
decide upon.

But hey, I'm there and will propbably be there a
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGG=ADGGG TIME so enjoy the show!!!!!!!!

If it's a "show", you're violating the law.

Steve, K4YZ

It's an informational broadcast bulletin show. Aye, matey, toss off
yee scurvy dogs and man the guns!!! There's piratin' ta do!!!" Arrg.

K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote: (and again violates "nettiquete" by not citing his
attributions)

A information bulletin is
a vague word.

"AN" information bulletin" mya be a vague TERM, Todd.

Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two words.

However that will be up to the Engineer in your FCC District to
decide upon.

But hey, I'm there and will propbably be there a
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGG*GGG TIME so enjoy the show!!!!!!!!

If it's a "show", you're violating the law.

This guy obviously has some issues, Steve. Tread lightly lest you be
accused under the ADA with cruelty to the mentally handicapped.

Todd's claims to inventions, to a recent state administered IQ test, his
inability to put together a properly constructed sentence, his inability
to spell, his lurches back and forth between upper/lower case
dim-wittedness and PROFANE UPPER CASE RANTING and his delusions about
the FCC being out to get him, all mark him as someone who is not quite
right.

I doubt that Todd is airing any informational bulletins/broadcasts/shows
at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by
regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door.

As to his blog: Who's reading it?

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote: (and again violates "nettiquete" by not citing his
attributions)

A information bulletin is
a vague word.

"AN" information bulletin" may be a vague TERM, Todd.

Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two
words.

Hi Dave...You and I know that, but Todd doesn't. That's why I said
"term", rahter than "word".

Any just-about-to-be-graduated-from-third-grader wouldn't have
taht mistake...But Todd did.

However that will be up to the Engineer in your FCC District
to
decide upon.

But hey, I'm there and will propbably be there a
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGG=ADGGG TIME so enjoy the
show!!!!!!!!

If it's a "show", you're violating the law.

This guy obviously has some issues, Steve. Tread lightly lest you be
accused under the ADA with cruelty to the mentally handicapped.

Mark Morgan tired that with me...remember! Didn't work then,
either!

Todd's claims to inventions, to a recent state administered IQ test,
his
inability to put together a properly constructed sentence, his
inability
to spell, his lurches back and forth between upper/lower case
dim-wittedness and PROFANE UPPER CASE RANTING and his delusions about
the FCC being out to get him, all mark him as someone who is not
quite
right.

Thereby providing even MORE justification for the FCC from
preventing his ascendency to commercial broadcasting.

I doubt that Todd is airing any informational
bulletins/broadcasts/shows
at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by
regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door.

He still doesn't get it...

His "opinion" doesn NOT meet the test of an "information
bulletin", no matter HOW impressed he is with the sound of his own
voice.

As to his blog: Who's reading it?

I can't say I "read" it, however what parts I did read were
rambling, paranoid and accusatory.

What an idiot.

Good to see you, Dave...How's things?

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

Good to see you, Dave...How's things?

Working on some antenna projects and chasing a little DX here. I spend
some of the rest of my time pondering the antics of Leonard H. Anderson
and they boy broadcaster.

Oh, and so Leonard won't have ammunition for his "chat room" rants,
I support retention of the measly five word per minute morse code test
in amateur radio.

Dave K8MN

Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two words.


Information can be gathered through facts as well as opinions.

I doubt that Todd is airing any informational
bulletins/broadcasts/shows
at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by
regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door.


I would count on it....I am on. As for material is "consisting solely
of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service"

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote (without attributing his quotes):

Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two
words.

Hey...no kidding, Toddie. WHERE did I say OTHERWISE...?!?!

Information can be gathered through facts as well as opinions.

You can call it blue polka dotted hen feathers for all I care,
Toddie. The results will be the same.

I doubt that Todd is airing any informational
bulletins/broadcasts/shows
at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by
regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door.


I would count on it....I am on. As for material is "consisting solely
of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service".

If it's tainted with your opinion, it ceases to be "information"
and is highly unlikely to be of any interest to "the amateur service".

Steve, K4YZ