Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some
material gleaned from the archives:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
from rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc, 1999

I'm trying to write a packet program for packet radio and i need
some help on serial port communication. i have no idea on how to get the
computer to talk to the tnc.

thanks 73
Todd N9OGL

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003


N9OGL ON GREG RUGGIERO VS FCC

First, you must not have to be very intelligent to be a ****ing judge of
the court of appeal.it seems if they can let this dumb ass bitch and her
little bitch whore buddies on the bench then anyone can..

(There's more. This is the cleanest portion)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003

ummmm....NO! I'm going to bitch and whine till I blue in the face. I'm
not
going to let this **** go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court of
appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was never
found guilty of a freaking crime and I ****ing barred from getting a
license. that's the true justice of ****ing america. Although you not
guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove yourselves
otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little **** ant
note
from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my
application or
my ****ing waiver...I applied long before I went pirate and their are
other
"pirates" out there that I know that also applied long before going
pirate.
So I'm going to continue to bitch and whine til somethings done about
this
injustice.

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
Langely Park Telecommunication
"Dr. Daffodil Swain" wrote in message

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003

Hell since
I can't get a license I just go back on the air without....after all it
was
judge Randoph that stated "
No one has a First Amendment right to a
license," Red Lion Broad. Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389 (1969), and it
follows that no one has a First Amendment right to apply for a license

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This one speaks to Todd's claim to have used various BBS software. It
is from rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc, Aug. 2003, not so very long ago:

What's the Best BBS program and how do you set it up

Todd N9OGL

(and)

Oh packet..I uses to run FBB BBS a long time ago on a different machine.
but I've pretty much forgotten how to set it up. MSYS I could never
figure out how to set up

Todd n9ogl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio pirate, May 1999

Well mark I tell you what, I applied twice for a licnese and both
time it was returned so your right SCREW THEM!!! I'm going on the air
without a License.

Todd
N9OGL

(and)

Hello John,

To tell you the truth John, I applied for a license twice and both time
they were returned. the last time they sent it back they claim I didn't
file during the "file window" Which is a bunch of crap because they
were
handing out low Power television station licenses and low power
television translator licenses. The FCC are a bunch of liars who do not
serve the public's intrest. I'm going on the air with my low Power
Television station if they want me they can come and get me. It is a
waste of time to apply for a license.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.sci.physics.new-theories, April 1999

Very true, the U.S. navy was experimenting in cloaking systems using
"electronic stealth" the equiptment used operated in the ELF (Extermly
Low
Frequencies) band around 1 hz. to 30 khz. The theory was to resonate a
electromagnetic pulse around 4 to 10 hz thus cloaking the ship from
radar and other electronic devices. The problem is no one really knows
what effects may accure in that region of the spectrum. The human brain
operates around 1 to 24 Hz. Black holes can be detected I believe around
10 hz. electricity runs around 50 to 60 Hz. Todd N9OGL

(and)

115 or 120 is your voltage not the cycles. in europe electricity
oscilllates at 50 Hz. while here in the united states it oscillates at
60 Hz. go in the bathroom at a fast food place and look at the hand
drier it states 60 Hz. now lightning operates around 500 Khz that's why
lightning tears up the AM and the H.F. Band. scientist monitor 100 hz.
for Black holes which resonate on that frequncy. well, it omittes a
gravitation field on that frequency. TODD
N9OGL

(I'm going to check out the hand dryers at McDonald's in an attempt to
confirm some of this little known stuff. I'm especially interested in
this news that lightning "operates around 500 KHz". I'll "omitt" the
rest)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.tv.public-access, Jan. 2001

Hi once again.... langley park has updated their home page a little and
will continue to update it often.

Todd Daugherty
CEO/PRESIDENT
LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION

http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html


(note that Todd is now CEO/PRESIDENT!)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, May 2000, Todd's "origization" looks for a type
"excepted" transmitter. The name change must reflect some on-air
personna.

hello,

My origization is wanting to apply for the LP100 license here in
Illinois when the filing window opens in August. We are looking for a
ten to twenty watt FCC type execpted transmitter. we mainly want to know
what the cost is on the transmitter.

Todd O'Dochartaigh
President
Langley Park Telecommunication

(and from June, 2000, Todd wants to save some money on the power bill!)

The Power is 50 to 100 watts ERP i failed to put the ERP because I was
in a rush to beat the thunderstorm.....but it can be easier and cheaper
to run low power to a good antenna with lots of DB gain and hardline as
the coax. hardline coax really isn't that expensive. if you look around
a little.plus hardline will have little lossage. Also running less
power
would save a little on the power bill.

Todd
------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Feb. 2000

....reality is Public Access has it problems with local authorities
trying to censor programming and those access channel they couldn't
censor the local authorities has shut down. So sure you have a little
radio station but watch what you say over them because if it's something
the local authorities don't want broadcast like police's violation of
Human rights then they will try every thing to get rid of you. "Oh but
Todd were protected by the FCC rules" well some local authorities give a
rats ass about the FCC or their rules. They will even go so far to try
to ban "radio signals except those all ready established" believe me
there are some local governments will try that. The local government
tried back in the 80's to ban all amateur radio signals to the city
limits. then there is of course antenna laws and sure the FCC can tell
you that the towers are exempted but the local governements have found
loopholes in the system. I've in the public Access business longer then
the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access
and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these Low Power Radio
Stations.

Todd O'Dochartaigh
WLPS-TV CHANNEL 14
Taylorville's Pirate Television station
~Born a Pirate, Die a Pirate~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Aug. 1999--Todd's disability and folks infringing
on his right to be a radio/TV pirate

First of you moron, it is my opinion and I have the right to express
it. It federal Suckup like you who infringe on peoples constitutional
right not only when it comes to busting Pirates but infringe on
peoples right who wish to voice their point of view on the internet.
It is people like you that have no life instead spend most of their
time on the net bad mouthing how people write or their opinion. I
really feel sorry for someone like you. It is in fact people like you
who are turning this from a constitutional system to a dictatorship.
As for my write I do have a disability and in that your lucky I don't
get you on discrimination. The FCC is also lucky if they think like you
that I don't them on it to. That All i have to say to you.

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL
WLPS TV CHANNNEL 14
Taylorville Illinois #1 Pirate TV station

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.broadcasting, May 1999, one of Todd's I'm 36-going-on-15
rants. The sig gets even more peculiar.

Hello,

I hear a lot about this low power radio petition and in my humble
opinion is a waste of time. I believe the FCC in a whole needs to be
changed. Changed back to serving the public's intrest instead of the big
Lobbying groups like the NAB and the CTIA. Below are the Ideas that I
believe the FCC should be following.

1. The Electromagnetic Spectrum belongs to the people and the
people should have a right to Uses the Spectrum.
2. The FCC should only be allowed to license that, which is under
47 USC 151 "Interstate and Foreign Commerce by wire or radio"
3. Not only should a person have the right to listen to not only
the broadcast services but all parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.
even the cellular band which is part of the radio spectrum and there by
belong to the people.
4. The people should have the right to choice his satellite
package. The person should have the right if he wants the Network feeds
off the satellite and wants to pay for them be allowed to buy them
regardless if he recieve local broadcasting.
5. The FCC should eliminate any useless services on the
electromagnetic spectrum (There is still some first generation radio
services on the air) Any new service like Digital Cellular Phones should
be phased into the old cell band instead of allocating them spectrum.
6. The FCC should make it easier for people to obtain a license,
they should promote the Idea of waivering fees and other stuff like
Techincal rules. The FCC should accept applications regardless if it's a
filing window or not.
7. The FCC shouldn't create quick fixs policies instead should try
to improve what they have internally.
8. The FCC should stop believing in this "burden on the commission"
because there is always going to be a burden regardless. instead the
FCC should try to get things done.
9. The FCC should work more closer to the people then the big
companies and organizations. The FCC believes they serve the public's
intrest but in reality the FAA serves the public's intrest better then
the FCC because the FAA listens to the people.
10. The Question of what's Interstate and what's Interstate should
be answered.

well that's it.....that's the changes I think are needed I believe the
FCC could care less on what I say or anyone in alt.radio.pirate. then
again I like everyone else bitching and voicing my opinion

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL
Amateur, Commercial, Television Taylorville (Taylorville Illinois, only
TV and Pirate station)

(and)

Sure there has been a few cases with
interferning with
the aircraft band as a pilot myself I wouldn't want that to happen.
However there has been a lot of low power services out there that
didn't
cause interfernce which out weights the cases that do. I am against
thre
LOW POWER RADIO PETITION because to me it is a quick fixs the FCC
should
allow that service now with waivers (which their rules allow) but they
will not. I did apply for a license twice and both times it was
returned
so my view is to HELL with them. Oh one more thing this "chaos" which
accured back in the 20's wasn't by Low power operators but by greedy
Commercial operators and the Navy.

(and)

Right, but there is a lot of broadcast services that don't cross the
line. for example my 8 watt Low power television transmitter which runs
on UHF will not cross the state line because 1. i'm in the middle of
the
state. 2. the power of 8 watts and the antenna height of 60 ft 3. the
terrain. fact is my station doesnot cross the state line and there by
the FCC doesn't have the juridiction over my signal.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc, Aug. 2003

Hello,
I'm wanting to be able to uses my laptop and communicate back to my
home computer via packet. I was wondering what software I need to do
this. I want be able to in my computer back home and get files off of
my home
computer when I need them and put them on my laptop.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from comp.lang.basic.misc, Feb. 2000

I've written a program which i've written in Qbasic which I'm
wanting to run over a modem. I have no idea how to set a program to have
the program talk to the modem. Any help would be appreciated

Todd
Todd N9OGL

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

More to come...

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some
material gleaned from the archives:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Too much to comment on!
BUT Todd should know that lightning "operates around 500 KHz" because
what you don't understand is that Todd the airline pilot invented lightning!

Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's some
material gleaned from the archives:


------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003

ummmm....NO! I'm going to bitch and whine till I blue in the face.
I'm
not
going to let this #### go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court
of
appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was
never
found guilty of a freaking crime and I ####ing barred from getting a

license.

Lack of maturity and character seem to be appropriate at this
point, just like I said.

And the grammar....sheeesh. I'd ground my 13-year old for a month
and sue the school district if she couldn't put a sentence together any
better than that!

that's the true justice of ###ing america.

We already have foreign terrorists trying to #### America...we
don't need another home-grown punk like you doing it too, Todd.

Although you not
guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove
yourselves
otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little ****
ant
note
from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my
application or
my ####ing waiver.

(1) I stand corrected. I made a comment on your "blog" that,
among your other profane and rambling rants, I had to admit that the
one thing I HADN'T seen you do was act racist. Weeeeelp. I was wrong
.. You ARE racist, Todd. Evidence above noted.

(2) I hope they NEVER grant your "####ing" waiver. People like
you don't need to be allowed to "####", thereby procreating even more
immature, profane, weakminded leeches to be let loose upon society.

Be glad that FCC licensure doesn't require IQ and DNA testing
first, Todd. You wouldn't have even been allowed to get par Part 95
operation.

Steve, K4YZ

You know Dave, you are violation of Copyright Law Don't you???



Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:

You know Dave, you are violation of Copyright Law Don't you???

How pathetic, Todd. Anything you write and send to usenet isn't
copyrighted. It is completely public and all archived.

Of course if you have differing opinions, you are free to file suit.

Dave K8MN

I've looked at his posts in the last 6 years also and I've never seen
anything more pathetic in my life about a retard playing wid radios.

N9OGL wrote:
You know Dave, you are violation of Copyright Law Don't you???

BBWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

W H A T A N I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

"Copyrighting" comments made to unmoderated, public USENET
newsgroups...?!?!?!?!

BBBBBBBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! !

Todd, each and every time I think you couldn't get any more
ludicrous or assinine, you prove me wrong!

Thanks!

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

1. The Electromagnetic Spectrum belongs to the people and the
people should have a right to Uses the Spectrum.

They do.

And under our Constitution and laws, the FCC ensures, to the best
of it's ability, that this FINITE RESOURCE will be accessible to all.
Of course electronic anarchists like N9OGL who believe that anyone
should do anything they like would make it impossible for anyone to use
it at all.

2. The FCC should only be allowed to license that, which is under
47 USC 151 "Interstate and Foreign Commerce by wire or radio"

OK.

Let's remove the FCC from the picture for a second. You go ahead
and fire up your LPFM station on 107.9 (or whatever frequency you
choose).

I live next town over and I want to operate on 107.9...Or
worse yet, I just want to jam you becasue I think your "opinion" or
programming format suck. Who ya gonna call now?

State or local agencies? OK...So Illinois allows you to operate
here...but just across the state line in Podunk, Missouri, THEY
"license" me to operate on that frequency...at 1500 watts, because in
MO they define "low power" as anything below 10,000 watts.

I'd usually expect a rational person to see where this is going,
but hey...it's Todd...

3. Not only should a person have the right to listen to not only
the broadcast services but all parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.

even the cellular band which is part of the radio spectrum and there
by
belong to the people.

Hey Todd...waddaya say I park a van outside your place and start
monitoring your cell and cordless phones. I further record them and
play them at local venues. Since everyone can listen to everything
under your "plan", nothing you say on "the phone" is protected.

4. The people should have the right to choice his satellite
package. The person should have the right if he wants the Network
feeds
off the satellite and wants to pay for them be allowed to buy them
regardless if he recieve local broadcasting.

Gee, Todd...We have that here in Tennessee...What's up with you in
Ill-annoyed?

5. The FCC should eliminate any useless services on the
electromagnetic spectrum (There is still some first generation radio
services on the air) Any new service like Digital Cellular Phones
should
be phased into the old cell band instead of allocating them spectrum.


You are incompetent to hold broadcast licensure, and only hold
Amateur licensure by the grace of God...Why would they consider your
"ideas" for wireless telephone technology?

6. The FCC should make it easier for people to obtain a license,
they should promote the Idea of waivering fees and other stuff like
Techincal rules. The FCC should accept applications regardless if
it's a
filing window or not.

Oh, heck yeah! Let's let anyone who get's it in thier head to do so
to have a license! And since we're loading the bands up with all these
citizen-broadcasters, let's screw the technical standards which help to
maximize the already dwindling spectrum! What's a little intermod or
bleed-over among broadcasters! Live out on the fringes of overlapping
stations? Too bad!

7. The FCC shouldn't create quick fixs policies instead should try
to improve what they have internally.

Does anyone other than Todd have an idea what this means?
Todd-to-English translation, please...???

8. The FCC should stop believing in this "burden on the commission"
because there is always going to be a burden regardless. instead the
FCC should try to get things done.

But Todd! You'd just throw them aside!

Besides, Todd...And I know this will be painful for you to accept,
but it's ill-informed, narrowminided, functioanlly illiterate IDIOTS
like you that create the burden in the first place!

9. The FCC should work more closer to the people then the big
companies and organizations. The FCC believes they serve the public's

intrest but in reality the FAA serves the public's intrest better
then
the FCC because the FAA listens to the people.

And what was the last NPRM from the FAA YOU responded to,
Todd?

What "issues" has the FAA addressed that the FCC has failed to do
so, Toddie?

10. The Question of what's Interstate and what's Interstate should
be answered.

BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !!

well that's it.....that's the changes I think are needed I believe
the
FCC could care less on what I say or anyone in alt.radio.pirate. then

again I like everyone else bitching and voicing my opinion

I enjoy seeing you act this way in public too, Todd...It reaffirms
my belief that procreation should be licensed, and abortions should be
permitted up to age 30.

Sure there has been a few cases with
interferning with
the aircraft band as a pilot myself I wouldn't want that to happen.
However there has been a lot of low power services out there that
didn't
cause interfernce which out weights the cases that do.

And which case that DOES cause interference to the avaition
allocations is OK, Todd? How many episodes of interference are OK to
the safety of flight?

Do YOU want to be on the flight that winds up two miles short of
the runway because some idiot LIKE YOU was exercising his "free speech"
on an ILS frequency? Do you want to be the guy who kept an FAA
facility from hearing a distress call or warning of a hijacking just so
you could transmit your "bulletins" on "pirate TV"...?!?!

That's EXACTLY what you're proposing with your anarchist licensing
ideas or relaxation of "technical rules"...

I am against
thre
LOW POWER RADIO PETITION because to me it is a quick fixs the FCC
should
allow that service now with waivers (which their rules allow) but
they
will not. I did apply for a license twice and both times it was
returned
so my view is to HELL with them.

I am sure your whole life has been full of people realizing what
an idiot you are and did their best to keep you from making a fool out
of yourself or harming others with your "me first" attitudes.

We can only hope the FCC will keep it up.

(I am kinda hoping K2ASP might "drop a dime" on some old friends
in Gettysburg to start the mill moving on Toddie now!)

Oh one more thing this "chaos" which
accured back in the 20's wasn't by Low power operators but by greedy

Commercial operators and the Navy.

Sure it was by "low power" operators! There were "broadcast
stations" popping up on every hotel and newspaper building across the
country!

Right, but there is a lot of broadcast services that don't cross the
line. for example my 8 watt Low power television transmitter which
runs
on UHF will not cross the state line because 1. i'm in the middle of
the
state. 2. the power of 8 watts and the antenna height of 60 ft 3.
the
terrain. fact is my station doesnot cross the state line and there
by
the FCC doesn't have the juridiction over my signal.

So...it's OK if you're "in the middle of the state"...But what
about folks who live close to state lines? Or people who live at
higher elevations and even low power carries far? Or how about folks
who live in realtively small states ie: Rhode Island, Delaware, etc?

They're just squat out of luck?

Face it, Todd...Not everyone can be or even SHOULD be a
"broadcaster".

L E A S T of all a racist, incompetent, functionally illiterate
idiot like you! But there is an "up" side...You do have a future as a
stand up comic...You've had us in stitches for days!

Steve, K4YZ

They do.

And under our Constitution and laws, the FCC ensures, to the best
of it's ability, that this FINITE RESOURCE will be accessible to all.
Of course electronic anarchists like N9OGL who believe that anyone
should do anything they like would make it impossible for anyone to use

it at all.


The finite resourse no longer hold true anymore thanks to digital
radio.....The point of that was that the FCC has over the last 10/20
years, has bent over backworks for the "special interest" and some of
the"special interest" goals sometimes do not reflect the public
interest.

OK.

Let's remove the FCC from the picture for a second. You go ahead
and fire up your LPFM station on 107.9 (or whatever frequency you
choose).


I live next town over and I want to operate on 107.9...Or
worse yet, I just want to jam you becasue I think your "opinion" or
programming format suck. Who ya gonna call now?


State or local agencies? OK...So Illinois allows you to operate
here...but just across the state line in Podunk, Missouri, THEY
"license" me to operate on that frequency...at 1500 watts, because in
MO they define "low power" as anything below 10,000 watts.


I'd usually expect a rational person to see where this is going,
but hey...it's Todd...

Under the Communication Act of 1934 the FCC has juridiction over
interstate and foreign commerce via wire or radio, Intrastate
communications is the juridiction of the state.

3. Not only should a person have the right to listen to not only
the broadcast services but all parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.

even the cellular band which is part of the radio spectrum and there
by
belong to the people.


Hey Todd...waddaya say I park a van outside your place and start
monitoring your cell and cordless phones. I further record them and
play them at local venues. Since everyone can listen to everything
under your "plan", nothing you say on "the phone" is protected.

No, the Electronoic Communication Privacy Act of 1986 was pushed by the
Cellphone companies because they didn't want to encrypt their phone
systems which they had the ability to do.

4. The people should have the right to choice his satellite
package. The person should have the right if he wants the Network
feeds
off the satellite and wants to pay for them be allowed to buy them
regardless if he recieve local broadcasting.


Gee, Todd...We have that here in Tennessee...What's up with you in
Ill-annoyed?

This post was written long before "Local channels" were placed on the
satellites. Before that (thanks to the National Association of
Broadcasters) if you lived in a alleged "contour" then you were not
allowed to get feeds off the satellite. The NAB pushed congress to pass
a law to protect "local services"


5. The FCC should eliminate any useless services on the
electromagnetic spectrum (There is still some first generation radio
services on the air) Any new service like Digital Cellular Phones
should
be phased into the old cell band instead of allocating them spectrum.



You are incompetent to hold broadcast licensure, and only hold
Amateur licensure by the grace of God...Why would they consider your
"ideas" for wireless telephone technology?

No dickhead, there is still first generation services on the
electromagnetic spectrum, and secondly instead of allocation new
frequencies for digital phones have the cell service phase out analog
phones and put digital phones in that same band, instead of giving them
new spectrum. The point is instead of allocation spectrum for a newer
version of a old service have that service group install in the new
service on the old and phase out the old...again this was write a long
time ago



Oh, heck yeah! Let's let anyone who get's it in thier head to do so

to have a license! And since we're loading the bands up with all these

citizen-broadcasters, let's screw the technical standards which help to

maximize the already dwindling spectrum! What's a little intermod or
bleed-over among broadcasters! Live out on the fringes of overlapping
stations? Too bad

No, I want the FCC to do is their JOB, the FCC is authorized to grant
licenses, and consider waivers, The Federal Courts has gone farther
stating the FCC MUST consider waiver, the bottom line is the FCC has
not once done that. As for "dwindling spectrum" again digtal radio/
television has pretty well put an end to that. A Digital TV station can
run more then one station on the same frequency, the same with digital
radio. But hey you licnesed CB operators are still using that old
"analog" system and basical don't know **** outside your own backyard

8. The FCC should stop believing in this "burden on the commission"
because there is always going to be a burden regardless. instead the
FCC should try to get things done.


But Todd! You'd just throw them aside!

Besides, Todd...And I know this will be painful for you to accept,
but it's ill-informed, narrowminided, functioanlly illiterate IDIOTS
like you that create the burden in the first place

First off you ****ing COCK SUCKER, what I was refering to was the FCC
pushing the burden of proof onto people in the courts, The old saying
you innocent into proven guilty is not true to the FCC is more like
your guilty until you prove yourself innocent, In some instance the FCC
has already made their decision before all the facts are gathered.

9. The FCC should work more closer to the people then the big
companies and organizations. The FCC believes they serve the public's

intrest but in reality the FAA serves the public's intrest better
then
the FCC because the FAA listens to the people.


And what was the last NPRM from the FAA YOU responded to,
Todd?

What "issues" has the FAA addressed that the FCC has failed to do
so, Toddie?


No dumb ass, the point is the FCC should serve the public's interest a
lot better then they do, instead the serve the special interest more
The special interest is only there to serve one person...themselves.
The point was the FAA serves the public interest BETTER then the FCC
does, Just look at the new sports license they recently passed.

10. The Question of what's Interstate and what's Interstate should
be answered.


The point of 10 was, and although it's screwed up i'll explain. The
question of Interstate Communications is not defined, simple for this
reason. the courts and congress believe that ALL RADIO transmissions,
despite their power, antenna height, and frequency is interstate by
nature. This stems from a federal court case dealing with a radio
station from the 1930's and later to CB cases in the late 50's on to
present time.

Sure there has been a few cases with
interferning with
the aircraft band as a pilot myself I wouldn't want that to happen.
However there has been a lot of low power services out there that
didn't
cause interfernce which out weights the cases that do.


And which case that DOES cause interference to the avaition
allocations is OK, Todd? How many episodes of interference are OK to
the safety of flight?

Do YOU want to be on the flight that winds up two miles short of
the runway because some idiot LIKE YOU was exercising his "free speech"

on an ILS frequency? Do you want to be the guy who kept an FAA
facility from hearing a distress call or warning of a hijacking just so

you could transmit your "bulletins" on "pirate TV"...?!?!


The problem with interference of the aircraft band is although there
has been cases of interference there is really no "proof" that it
happened. TV is a different matter because it is higher up on the
spectrum and the olds of interference is lower, compare to a "pirate
radio station" I will point out though that Unlicensed Broadcast has
interfere with airports and so has Licensed Broadcast.

I am against
thre
LOW POWER RADIO PETITION because to me it is a quick fixs the FCC
should
allow that service now with waivers (which their rules allow) but
they
will not. I did apply for a license twice and both times it was
returned
so my view is to HELL with them.


I am sure your whole life has been full of people realizing what
an idiot you are and did their best to keep you from making a fool out
of yourself or harming others with your "me first" attitudes.

We can only hope the FCC will keep it up.


No dickhead, the point was the LPFM service was a quick fix, the FCC
had the power before creating that service, but the Mass Media Bureau
didn't and would not act upon it. (ie. they wouldn't consider
applications and waiver for stations less then 100 watts, although the
Federal Courts told them they MUST consider waivers.)

(I am kinda hoping K2ASP might "drop a dime" on some old friends
in Gettysburg to start the mill moving on Toddie now!)

GO FO IT!!! I DARE YOU!!! but you better know what your getting
youself into....

Oh one more thing this "chaos" which
accured back in the 20's wasn't by Low power operators but by greedy

Commercial operators and the Navy.


Sure it was by "low power" operators! There were "broadcast
stations" popping up on every hotel and newspaper building across the
country!

I would really suggest you go back and read the history of radio,
including the early years. because that's where that statement is
coming from.

Right, but there is a lot of broadcast services that don't cross the
line. for example my 8 watt Low power television transmitter which
runs
on UHF will not cross the state line because 1. i'm in the middle of

the
state. 2. the power of 8 watts and the antenna height of 60 ft 3.
the
terrain. fact is my station doesnot cross the state line and there
by
the FCC doesn't have the juridiction over my signal.


So...it's OK if you're "in the middle of the state"...But what
about folks who live close to state lines? Or people who live at
higher elevations and even low power carries far? Or how about folks
who live in realtively small states ie: Rhode Island, Delaware, etc?

They're just squat out of luck?


Face it, Todd...Not everyone can be or even SHOULD be a
"broadcaster".


L E A S T of all a racist, incompetent, functionally illiterate
idiot like you! But there is an "up" side...You do have a future as a
stand up comic...You've had us in stitches for days!

again this has to do with intrastate vs Interstate
communications.....at lease I'm not some dickhead ham radio operator
who gets on a newsgroup and plays HAM COP.


Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:

Even if your reply had included attributions, Todd, it would still be
difficult to read.

Under the Communication Act of 1934 the FCC has juridiction over
interstate and foreign commerce via wire or radio, Intrastate
communications is the juridiction of the state.

That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio.

First off you F--king C--K S--KER, what I was refering to was the FCC
pushing the burden of proof onto people in the courts, The old saying
you innocent into proven guilty is not true to the FCC...

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from
"innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.
...is more like
your guilty until you prove yourself innocent, In some instance the FCC
has already made their decision before all the facts are gathered.

Doesn't look that happened with regard to issuing you a broadcast
license.


No dumb ass, the point is the FCC should serve the public's interest a
lot better then they do, instead the serve the special interest more
The special interest is only there to serve one person...themselves.

Wow! That's quite enlightening. The special interests are in reality
just one person?

The point of 10 was, and although it's screwed up i'll explain. The
question of Interstate Communications is not defined, simple for this
reason. the courts and congress believe that ALL RADIO transmissions,
despite their power, antenna height, and frequency is interstate by
nature. This stems from a federal court case dealing with a radio
station from the 1930's and later to CB cases in the late 50's on to
present time.

Interstate communications regulation was defined long ago. Your lack of
understanding doesn't mean that there is no definition.


The problem with interference of the aircraft band is although there
has been cases of interference there is really no "proof" that it
happened.

Really? And you know this how?

K4YZ: "(I am kinda hoping K2ASP might "drop a dime" on some old friends
in Gettysburg to start the mill moving on Toddie now!)"

GO FO IT!!! I DARE YOU!!! but you better know what your getting
youself into....

A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting
like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

Dave K8MN